Literature DB >> 24815064

Development and validation of a clinical prediction score (the SCOPE score) to predict sedation outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.

E D Braunstein1, R Rosenberg, F Gress, P H R Green, B Lebwohl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of anaesthesia services during endoscopy has increased, increasing cost of endoscopy. AIM: To identify risk factors for and develop a clinical prediction score to predict difficult conscious sedation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all patients who underwent oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and colonoscopy with endoscopist-administered conscious sedation. The endpoint of difficult sedation was a composite of receipt of high doses (top quintile) of benzodiazepines and opioids, or the documentation of agitation or discomfort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to measure association of the outcome with: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), procedure indication, tobacco use, self-reported psychiatric history, chronic use of benzodiazepines, opioids or other psychoactive medications, admission status and participation of a trainee. A clinical prediction score was constructed using statistically significant variables.
RESULTS: We identified 13,711 OGDs and 21,763 colonoscopies, 1704 (12.4%) and 2299 (10.6%) of which met the primary endpoint, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with difficulty during OGD were younger age, procedure indication, male sex, presence of a trainee, psychiatric history and benzodiazepine and opioid use. Factors associated with difficulty during colonoscopy were younger age, female sex, BMI <25, procedure indication, tobacco, benzodiazepine, opioid and other psychoactive medication use. A clinical prediction score was developed and validated that may be used to risk-stratify patients undergoing OGD and colonoscopy across five risk classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the Stratifying Clinical Outcomes Prior to Endoscopy (SCOPE) score, patients may be risk stratified for difficult sedation/high sedation requirement during OGD and colonoscopy.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815064     DOI: 10.1111/apt.12786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

2.  Information seeking and anxiety among colonoscopy-naïve adults: Direct-to-colonoscopy vs traditional consult-first pathways.

Authors:  Jocelyn A Silvester; Harmandeep Kalkat; Lesley A Graff; John R Walker; Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-16

3.  Identification of factors associated with sedation tolerance in 5000 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy: Canadian tertiary center experience.

Authors:  Alexandra Shingina; George Ou; Oliver Takach; Sigrid Svarta; Ricky Kwok; Jessica Tong; Kieran Donaldson; Eric Lam; Robert Enns
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-12-16

4.  High body mass index is a risk factor for difficult deep sedation in percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Katharina Hellhammer; Shazia Afzal; Renate Tigges; Maximilian Spieker; Tienush Rassaf; Tobias Zeus; Ralf Westenfeld; Malte Kelm; Patrick Horn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Clinical Characteristics in Stratifying Sedation Risk: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Elliott Rebello; Dionne Rebello; Sehrish Jamot; Fabian Vargas; Jason Machan; Harlan Rich
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2021-08-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.