BACKGROUND: The prognosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS), especially for patients with tumours > 5 cm has been reported to be dismal, even after conventional surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT). OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with taxane (T + RT) and maintenance chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients with CAS treated with T + RT and 12 patients treated with S + RT. None had distant metastasis. Tumour sites included the scalp (n = 25) and limbs (n = 3). The chemotherapy regimens used in T + RT were monthly docetaxel (n = 10), biweekly docetaxel (n = 1), weekly docetaxel (n = 5) and weekly paclitaxel (n = 1). The median radiation dose was 70 Gy. Nine patients receiving T + RT continued chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (monthly docetaxel in nine patients and monthly paclitaxel in two patients) and four patients receiving S + RT received adjuvant chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel). RESULTS: The response ratio of T + RT was 94% (14 complete remission and one partial remission). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients receiving T + RT was statistically higher than those receiving conventional S + RT (56% and 8%, respectively; P < 0·01). Moreover, patients who received T + RT with maintenance chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in OS than those receiving T + RT alone (P < 0·01). There was a strong trend for relapse-free survival, but it was not significant (P = 0·07). These data indicate that maintenance chemotherapy is crucial for long-term survival after T + RT. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, we suggest that T + RT followed by maintenance chemotherapy is a plausible method for managing CAS, especially large tumours that are difficult to manage with S + RT alone.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS), especially for patients with tumours > 5 cm has been reported to be dismal, even after conventional surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT). OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with taxane (T + RT) and maintenance chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients with CAS treated with T + RT and 12 patients treated with S + RT. None had distant metastasis. Tumour sites included the scalp (n = 25) and limbs (n = 3). The chemotherapy regimens used in T + RT were monthly docetaxel (n = 10), biweekly docetaxel (n = 1), weekly docetaxel (n = 5) and weekly paclitaxel (n = 1). The median radiation dose was 70 Gy. Nine patients receiving T + RT continued chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (monthly docetaxel in nine patients and monthly paclitaxel in two patients) and four patients receiving S + RT received adjuvant chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel). RESULTS: The response ratio of T + RT was 94% (14 complete remission and one partial remission). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients receiving T + RT was statistically higher than those receiving conventional S + RT (56% and 8%, respectively; P < 0·01). Moreover, patients who received T + RT with maintenance chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in OS than those receiving T + RT alone (P < 0·01). There was a strong trend for relapse-free survival, but it was not significant (P = 0·07). These data indicate that maintenance chemotherapy is crucial for long-term survival after T + RT. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, we suggest that T + RT followed by maintenance chemotherapy is a plausible method for managing CAS, especially large tumours that are difficult to manage with S + RT alone.