Raoul P Kloppenborg1, Paul J Nederkoorn2, Mirjam I Geerlings2, Esther van den Berg2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (R.P.K., P.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (R.P.K., M.I.G.) and Department of Neurology (R.P.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Experimental Psychology (E.v.d.B.), Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University; and the Department of Neurology (E.v.d.B.), Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. r.p.kloppenborg-4@umcutrecht.nl. 2. From the Department of Neurology (R.P.K., P.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (R.P.K., M.I.G.) and Department of Neurology (R.P.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Experimental Psychology (E.v.d.B.), Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University; and the Department of Neurology (E.v.d.B.), Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the effects of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on specific cognitive functions with particular attention to WMH progression and localization. METHODS: PubMed (January 1990-July 2013) and bibliographies from included articles were used. Studies that were included (1) used MRI; (2) had a population-based or case-control design with a healthy control group that could be used for analysis; (3) matched/adjusted for age, sex, and education; and (4) addressed ≥1 predefined cognitive domains with ≥1 validated neuropsychological tests. Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators. Pearson r was extracted/calculated and used as the common metric for the effect size across studies. RESULTS: Twenty-three cross-sectional and 14 longitudinal studies were included with a total of 8,685 and 7,731 participants. Presence of WMHs was significantly associated with concurrent cognitive deficits in all examined domains: general intelligence (Fisher z -0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.19 to -0.04), memory (-0.08, -0.13 to -0.06), processing speed (-0.11, -0.17 to -0.07), attention and executive functions (-0.11, -0.16 to -0.07), and perception/construction (-0.15, -0.21 to -0.07). Similar effect sizes were observed for cognitive decline over time. WMH progression was associated with greater cognitive decline, particularly for general intelligence (Fisher z -0.31, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.02) and attention and executive functions (-0.32, -0.34 to -0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The small but robust and consistent effects of WMHs on all cognitive domains suggest a more global effect on cognition than previously thought. Progression of WMHs was associated with even worse cognitive functioning, most pronounced in attention and executive functioning.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the effects of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on specific cognitive functions with particular attention to WMH progression and localization. METHODS: PubMed (January 1990-July 2013) and bibliographies from included articles were used. Studies that were included (1) used MRI; (2) had a population-based or case-control design with a healthy control group that could be used for analysis; (3) matched/adjusted for age, sex, and education; and (4) addressed ≥1 predefined cognitive domains with ≥1 validated neuropsychological tests. Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators. Pearson r was extracted/calculated and used as the common metric for the effect size across studies. RESULTS: Twenty-three cross-sectional and 14 longitudinal studies were included with a total of 8,685 and 7,731 participants. Presence of WMHs was significantly associated with concurrent cognitive deficits in all examined domains: general intelligence (Fisher z -0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.19 to -0.04), memory (-0.08, -0.13 to -0.06), processing speed (-0.11, -0.17 to -0.07), attention and executive functions (-0.11, -0.16 to -0.07), and perception/construction (-0.15, -0.21 to -0.07). Similar effect sizes were observed for cognitive decline over time. WMH progression was associated with greater cognitive decline, particularly for general intelligence (Fisher z -0.31, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.02) and attention and executive functions (-0.32, -0.34 to -0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The small but robust and consistent effects of WMHs on all cognitive domains suggest a more global effect on cognition than previously thought. Progression of WMHs was associated with even worse cognitive functioning, most pronounced in attention and executive functioning.
Authors: Yael D Reijmer; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; David H Salat; Aaron Schultz; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Alison M Ayres; Anastasia Vashkevich; Diana Rosas; Kristin Schwab; Alexander Leemans; Geert-Jan Biessels; Jonathan Rosand; Keith A Johnson; Anand Viswanathan; M Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Brain Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: John E Morley; John C Morris; Marla Berg-Weger; Soo Borson; Brian D Carpenter; Natalia Del Campo; Bruno Dubois; Keith Fargo; L Jaime Fitten; Joseph H Flaherty; Mary Ganguli; George T Grossberg; Theodore K Malmstrom; Ronald D Petersen; Carroll Rodriguez; Andrew J Saykin; Philip Scheltens; Eric G Tangalos; Joe Verghese; Gordon Wilcock; Bengt Winblad; Jean Woo; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jennifer A McGuire; Paul M Sherman; Erica Dean; Jeremy M Bernot; Laura M Rowland; Stephen A McGuire; Peter V Kochunov Journal: Mil Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Nienke Legdeur; Pieter Jelle Visser; Davis C Woodworth; Majon Muller; Evan Fletcher; Pauline Maillard; Philip Scheltens; Charles DeCarli; Claudia H Kawas; María M Corrada Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Michael A Sugarman; Lilah M Besser; Yorghos Tripodis; Brett Martin; Joseph N Palmisano; Neil W Kowall; Rhoda Au; Jesse Mez; Charles DeCarli; Thor D Stein; Ann C McKee; Ronald J Killiany; Robert A Stern Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Anil M Tuladhar; Ewoud van Dijk; Marcel P Zwiers; Anouk G W van Norden; Karlijn F de Laat; Elena Shumskaya; David G Norris; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Leroy L Cooper; Todd Woodard; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Mark A van Buchem; Alyssa A Torjesen; Lesley A Inker; Thor Aspelund; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer; Gary F Mitchell Journal: Hypertension Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 10.190