Literature DB >> 24814771

Endoscopic treatment of severe duodenal polyposis as an alternative to surgery for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Driffa Moussata1, Bertrand Napoleon2, Vincent Lepilliez2, Amna Klich3, René Ecochard3, Marie-Georges Lapalus2, Stéphane Nancey1, Jean-Claude Cenni1, Thierry Ponchon2, Jean-Alain Chayvialle2, Jean-Christophe Saurin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and severe (stage IV) duodenal polyposis are candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy, which has high morbidity. Little information is available about the feasibility of therapeutic endoscopy for these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficiency and risks of endoscopic therapy.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: A 2-referral center long-term cohort study. PATIENTS: Thirty-five FAP patients (15 men, mean age 48 years) presenting with stage IV duodenal polyposis were included. Patients had a mean Spigelman classification score of 9.8 points (range 9-12 points) at their first examination.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent a surveillance endoscopy, including lateral and axial viewing with chromoendoscopy while under sedation, along with 7 ± 4.8 therapeutic endoscopic sessions during a follow-up period of 9 ± 4.5 years (range 1-19 years) after their first endoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Treatment modalities, adverse events, and efficiency (evolution of the Spigelman score) were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 245 therapeutic endoscopies were performed and 15 adverse events (6%) occurred. During the follow-up period, Spigelman scores decreased in 95% of patients by 6 ± 2.2 points (P = .002). Modeling analysis showed that the mean Spigelman score decreased by 60% after 150 months. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and the duration of the follow-up, even though this is the longest follow-up reported in medical literature.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of severe duodenal polyposis in patients with FAP produces few adverse events and allows efficient downstaging of the polyposis. Long-term follow-up data did not reveal a high risk of invasive duodenal cancer in these patients.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814771     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  Feasibility of endoscopic resection using bipolar snare for nonampullary duodenal tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Authors:  Kazuya Inoki; Takeshi Nakajima; Satoru Nonaka; Seiichiro Abe; Haruhisa Suzuki; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Ichiro Oda; Masayoshi Yamada; Mizuki Takatsu; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Shigeki Sekine; Yuichiro Ohe; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Familial adenomatous polyposis in China.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Qing Wei Liu; Liang Wen Li; Qiang Zhi Wang; Min Hong; Jian Dong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Role of endoscopy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 4.  Duodenal adenoma surveillance in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos; Marianny Sulbaran; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

5.  Upper gastrointestinal neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis: prevalence, endoscopic features and management.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Marianny Sulbaran; Leonardo Alfonso Bustamante-Lopez; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

6.  Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Nicola Bradshaw; Sunil Dolwani; Bianca Desouza; Malcolm G Dunlop; James E East; Mohammad Ilyas; Asha Kaur; Fiona Lalloo; Andrew Latchford; Matthew D Rutter; Ian Tomlinson; Huw J W Thomas; James Hill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review.

Authors:  E Soons; T M Bisseling; M C A van Kouwen; G Möslein; P D Siersema
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Surveillance of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients: medical objectives and technical requirements.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Saurin; Mathieu Pioche; Jérôme Rivory
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-10-08

Review 9.  Management of Patients with Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes.

Authors:  Catarina Brandão; Jorge Lage
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 10.  Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.

Authors:  Maxime Amoyel; Arthur Belle; Marion Dhooge; Einas Abou Ali; Rachel Hallit; Frederic Prat; Anthony Dohan; Benoit Terris; Stanislas Chaussade; Romain Coriat; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.