Gera E Nagelhout1, Karin Hummel2, Marc C Willemsen3, Mohammad Siahpush4, Anton E Kunst5, Hein de Vries2, Geoffrey T Fong6, Bas van den Putte7. 1. Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Alliance Smokefree Holland, The Hague, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Gera.Nagelhout@alliantieNR.nl. 2. Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Alliance Smokefree Holland, The Hague, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States. 5. Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Psychology and School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam (ASCoR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined possible income differences in the impact of a national reimbursement policy for smoking cessation treatment and accompanying media attention in the Netherlands in 2011. METHODS: We used three waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey, a nationally representative longitudinal sample of smokers aged 15 years and older (n=1912). The main analyses tested trends and income differences in outcome measures (smokers' quit attempt rates, use of behavioral counseling, use of cessation medications, and quit success) and awareness variables (awareness of reimbursement possibilities, the media campaign, medications advertisements and other media attention) with generalized estimating equations analyses. RESULTS: In the first half of 2011, there was a significant increase in quit attempts (odds ratio (OR)=2.02, p<0.001) and quit success (OR=1.47, p<0.001). Use of counseling and medications remained stable at 3% of all smokers in this period. Awareness of reimbursement possibilities increased from 11% to 42% (OR=6.38, p<0.001). Only awareness of the media campaign was associated with more quit attempts at the follow-up survey (OR=1.95, p<0.001). Results were not different according to smokers' income level. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch reimbursement policy with accompanying media attention was followed by an increase in quit attempts and quit success, but use of cessation treatment remained stable. The impact of the policy and media attention did not seem to have decreased or increased socioeconomic inequalities in quit attempts, use of cessation treatment, or quit success.
BACKGROUND: This study examined possible income differences in the impact of a national reimbursement policy for smoking cessation treatment and accompanying media attention in the Netherlands in 2011. METHODS: We used three waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey, a nationally representative longitudinal sample of smokers aged 15 years and older (n=1912). The main analyses tested trends and income differences in outcome measures (smokers' quit attempt rates, use of behavioral counseling, use of cessation medications, and quit success) and awareness variables (awareness of reimbursement possibilities, the media campaign, medications advertisements and other media attention) with generalized estimating equations analyses. RESULTS: In the first half of 2011, there was a significant increase in quit attempts (odds ratio (OR)=2.02, p<0.001) and quit success (OR=1.47, p<0.001). Use of counseling and medications remained stable at 3% of all smokers in this period. Awareness of reimbursement possibilities increased from 11% to 42% (OR=6.38, p<0.001). Only awareness of the media campaign was associated with more quit attempts at the follow-up survey (OR=1.95, p<0.001). Results were not different according to smokers' income level. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch reimbursement policy with accompanying media attention was followed by an increase in quit attempts and quit success, but use of cessation treatment remained stable. The impact of the policy and media attention did not seem to have decreased or increased socioeconomic inequalities in quit attempts, use of cessation treatment, or quit success.
Authors: Christopher W Kahler; Ron Borland; Andrew Hyland; Sherry A McKee; Mary E Thompson; K Michael Cummings Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ron Borland; Lin Li; Pete Driezen; Nick Wilson; David Hammond; Mary E Thompson; Geoffrey T Fong; Ute Mons; Marc C Willemsen; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; K Michael Cummings Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Gera E Nagelhout; Marc C Willemsen; Mary E Thompson; Geoffrey T Fong; Bas van den Putte; Hein de Vries Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Gera E Nagelhout; Dianne de Korte-de Boer; Anton E Kunst; Regina M van der Meer; Hein de Vries; Boukje M van Gelder; Marc C Willemsen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Fiona E Benson; Mirte A G Kuipers; Vera Nierkens; Jan-Willem Bruggink; Karien Stronks; Anton E Kunst Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Patricia Moreno-Peral; Sonia Conejo-Cerón; Ana Fernández; Anna Berenguera; María Martínez-Andrés; Mariona Pons-Vigués; Emma Motrico; Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín; Juan A Bellón; Maria Rubio-Valera Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240