Literature DB >> 24814526

A reliable approach to distinguish between transient with and without HFOs using TQWT and MCA.

Sahbi Chaibi1, Tarek Lajnef2, Zied Sakka2, Mounir Samet2, Abdennaceur Kachouri3.   

Abstract

Recent studies have reported that discrete high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the range of 80-500Hz may serve as promising biomarkers of the seizure focus in humans. Visual scoring of HFOs is tiring, time consuming, highly subjective and requires a great deal of mental concentration. Due to the recent explosion of HFOs research, development of a robust automated detector is expected to play a vital role in studying HFOs and their relationship to epileptogenesis. Therefore, a handful of automated detectors have been introduced in the literature over the past few years. In fact, all the proposed methods have been associated with high false-positive rates, which essentially arising from filtered sharp transients like spikes, sharp waves and artifacts. In order to specifically minimize false positive rates and improve the specificity of HFOs detection, we proposed a new approach, which is a combination of tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT), morphological component analysis (MCA) and complex Morlet wavelet (CMW). The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: The proposed method results in a sensitivity of 96.77%, a specificity of 85.00% and a false discovery rate (FDR) of 07.41%. Compared to this, the classical CMW method applied directly on the signals without pre-processing by TQWT-MCA achieves a sensitivity of 98.71%, a specificity of 18.75%, and an FDR of 29.95%. The proposed method may be considered highly accurate to distinguish between transients with and without HFOs. Consequently, it is remarkably reliable and robust for the detection of HFOs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex Morlet wavelet (CMW); Epilepsy; High frequency oscillations (HFOs); Morphological component analysis (MCA); Transient with HFOs (TWH); Transient without HFOs (TWHH); Tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814526     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

1.  A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.

Authors:  Sahbi Chaibi; Tarek Lajnef; Abdelbacet Ghrob; Mounir Samet; Abdennaceur Kachouri
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 2.  Resonance-Based Sparse Signal Decomposition and its Application in Mechanical Fault Diagnosis: A Review.

Authors:  Wentao Huang; Hongjian Sun; Weijie Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  What are the assets and weaknesses of HFO detectors? A benchmark framework based on realistic simulations.

Authors:  Nicolas Roehri; Francesca Pizzo; Fabrice Bartolomei; Fabrice Wendling; Christian-George Bénar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sleep spindle and K-complex detection using tunable Q-factor wavelet transform and morphological component analysis.

Authors:  Tarek Lajnef; Sahbi Chaibi; Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub; Perrine M Ruby; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Mounir Samet; Abdennaceur Kachouri; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A Sparsity-Promoted Decomposition for Compressed Fault Diagnosis of Roller Bearings.

Authors:  Huaqing Wang; Yanliang Ke; Liuyang Song; Gang Tang; Peng Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.