Literature DB >> 24814178

Predicting renal cryoablation complications: new risk score based on tumor size and location and patient history.

Grant D Schmit1, Louis A Schenck, R Houston Thompson, Stephen A Boorjian, A Nicholas Kurup, Adam J Weisbrod, Daryl J Kor, Matthew R Callstrom, Thomas D Atwell, Rickey E Carter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify tumor and patient-related risk factors for major complications following renal cryoablation and to develop a model for predicting these adverse events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. All 398 renal cryoablation procedures performed from 2003 through 2011 were reviewed to identify tumor and patient-related risk factors associated with major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification, ≥ grade III). A scoring system for predicting these adverse events was then developed using risk factor weighting obtained from a multivariate logistic regression model. To internally validate this model, the scoring system was then applied to all 73 renal cryoablation procedures performed during 2012.
RESULTS: Among tumor-related factors evaluated, Maximal tumor diameter (P = .0006) and Central tumor location (P = .02) were significantly associated with major complications. Among patient-related factors evaluated, prior Myocardial infarction (MI) (P = .002) and Complicated diabetes mellitus (P = .01) were significantly associated with major complications. This resulted in the (MC)2 risk scoring system, with (MC)2 risk score = 2.5 points (for tumors ≤ 2.5 cm in maximal diameter) or 0.1 points for each millimeter of maximal tumor diameter (for tumors > 2.5 cm) + 1.5 points (if central tumor location) + 2.5 points (if patient history of prior MI) + 3.0 points (if patient history of complicated diabetes). Mean (MC)2 risk score for all renal cryoablations was 4.7 (standard deviation, 1.9; range, 2.5-15.3). The observed major complication rates were 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6%, 4.6%) in the low-risk group (score < 5.0), 12.8% (95% CI: 7.5%, 19.9%) in the moderate-risk group (score of 5.0-8.0), and 39.1% (95% CI: 19.7%, 61.5%) in the high-risk group (score > 8.0). Application of the (MC)2 scoring system to the validation group yielded a concordance index of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.00).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the (MC)2 risk score is a valuable tool for predicting major complications in patients undergoing renal cryoablation. However, external validation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814178     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and management of infectious complications of percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Steven Y Huang; Asher Philip; Michael D Richter; Sanjay Gupta; Mark L Lessne; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Percutaneous Ablation Versus Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for T1a Renal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Adam D Talenfeld; Renee L Gennarelli; Elena B Elkin; Coral L Atoria; Jeremy C Durack; William C Huang; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Radiation dose reduction in CT-guided cryoablation of renal tumors.

Authors:  Jim Zhong; Michael Gallagher; Chris Hounslow; Gareth Iball; Tze Wah
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging.

Authors:  Winston B Joe; Jessica G Zarzour; Andrew J Gunn
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Sagar Rohitkumar Patel; Sean Francois; Tiagpaul Bhamber; Holt Evans; Kris Gaston; Stephen B Riggs; Chris Teigland; Peter E Clark; Ornob P Roy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-03-23

6.  Percutaneous Cryoablation of Stage T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: Safety, Technical Results, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew J Gunn; Winston B Joe; Aliaksei Salei; Husameddin El Khudari; Khalid H Mahmoud; Eric Bready; Eric M Keasler; Patrick P Patten; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Ahmed K Abdel Aal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Since 2012.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Choi; Jong Woo Kim; Jin Hyoung Kim; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Ureteral obstruction by sloughed tumor complicating cryoablation of a renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  Hiro Okawa; Hideo Gobara; Yusuke Matsui; Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-14

Review 9.  Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation guidelines for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Shu Huei Shen; Masashi Fujimori; Yi Wang
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-07

10.  Percutaneous CT-Guided Renal Cryoablation: Technical Aspects, Safety, and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in a Single Center.

Authors:  Stefano Cernic; Cristina Marrocchio; Riccardo Ciabattoni; Ilaria Fiorese; Fulvio Stacul; Fabiola Giudici; Michele Rizzo; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.