Nicolas A Yannuzzi1, Samir N Patel1, Kavita V Bhavsar2, Fumitaka Sugiguchi1, K Bailey Freund3. 1. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, New York. 2. LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, New York; Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. 3. LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, New York; Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. Electronic address: kbfnyf@aol.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection techniques and preferences within the retinal community and to identify potential factors associated with the development of sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in patients treated withintravitreal anti-VEGF therapyfor neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional physician survey. METHODS:Five hundred and thirty retina specialists spanning both private and academic practices were surveyed regarding current anti-VEGF intravitreal injection protocols, including the anti-VEGF drug of choice, needle gauge, injection volume, injection technique, and self-reported prevalence of sustained IOP elevation. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess the potential influence of these factors on long-term IOP. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two specialists (55%) reported believing that intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy may cause sustained IOP elevation. Of these responses, the most common reported prevalence was 1%-2% (48%), followed by 3%-5% (34%). There was no relationship between the frequency of sustained IOP elevation and anti-VEGF drug of choice. Physicians who injected greater than 0.05 cc in less than 1 second were 5.56 times more likely to observe a high frequency of sustained IOP elevation (P=.006, 95% CI 1.64-18.89). CONCLUSIONS: Based on physician survey data, serial anti-VEGF injections using higher injection volumes with a rapid injection technique may potentially lead to sustained IOP elevation. The underlying mechanism for this complication may be injury to the trabecular meshwork resulting from rapid elevations in IOP. Further investigation of the relationship between injection techniques and sustained IOP elevation in the form of retrospective or prospective clinical studies is warranted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine the intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection techniques and preferences within the retinal community and to identify potential factors associated with the development of sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional physician survey. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty retina specialists spanning both private and academic practices were surveyed regarding current anti-VEGF intravitreal injection protocols, including the anti-VEGF drug of choice, needle gauge, injection volume, injection technique, and self-reported prevalence of sustained IOP elevation. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess the potential influence of these factors on long-term IOP. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two specialists (55%) reported believing that intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy may cause sustained IOP elevation. Of these responses, the most common reported prevalence was 1%-2% (48%), followed by 3%-5% (34%). There was no relationship between the frequency of sustained IOP elevation and anti-VEGF drug of choice. Physicians who injected greater than 0.05 cc in less than 1 second were 5.56 times more likely to observe a high frequency of sustained IOP elevation (P=.006, 95% CI 1.64-18.89). CONCLUSIONS: Based on physician survey data, serial anti-VEGF injections using higher injection volumes with a rapid injection technique may potentially lead to sustained IOP elevation. The underlying mechanism for this complication may be injury to the trabecular meshwork resulting from rapid elevations in IOP. Further investigation of the relationship between injection techniques and sustained IOP elevation in the form of retrospective or prospective clinical studies is warranted.
Authors: Brennan D Eadie; Mahyar Etminan; Bruce C Carleton; David A Maberley; Frederick S Mikelberg Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Ester Reina-Torres; Joanne C Wen; Katy C Liu; Guorong Li; Joseph M Sherwood; Jason Y H Chang; Pratap Challa; Cassandra M Flügel-Koch; W Daniel Stamer; R Rand Allingham; Darryl R Overby Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Joanne C Wen; Ester Reina-Torres; Joseph M Sherwood; Pratap Challa; Katy C Liu; Guorong Li; Jason Y H Chang; Scott W Cousins; Stefanie G Schuman; Priyatham S Mettu; W Daniel Stamer; Darryl R Overby; R Rand Allingham Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799