Literature DB >> 24814110

A single center multioperator initial experience of 4,195 patients at a primary radial intervention program in a tertiary level center.

Rajendra K Gokhroo1, Satish K Kaushik2, Deepak Padmanabhan3, Devendra Bisht4, Sajal Gupta4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase the acceptability and the number of the procedures via the radial approach. We present our experience pertaining to the clinical characteristics, procedural details and post procedural outcome of patients undergoing radial artery access, coronary angiographies over a period of 4 years at a primary care tertiary level center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all the coronary artery procedures during the last 4 years was done and the various parameters related to these procedures noted.
RESULTS: In 4195 procedures performed, success in radial artery procedures was achieved in 3975 (94.8%) procedures. The average puncture time and total procedure time was 9.5 + 3 min (min) and 15 + 2.5 min in the initial 500 patients, whereas the times taken in the final 695 patients were just 1.5 + 0.5 min and 3.0 + 1.5 min respectively. The total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different among the groups, when performed by an operator with training in the femoral route for angiography. Cardiology fellows needed more fluoroscopy time when mastering the radial route. Crossover of access sites was seen in 220 patients (5.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: After 100 procedures, radial access coronary angiographies take less than 4.5 min, with first attempt radial artery access and negligible complication rates. Prior experience of coronary angiography helps in the reduction of fluoroscopy time during the learning curve.
Copyright © 2013 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Femoral artery access; Radial artery access

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24814110      PMCID: PMC4017385          DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Heart J        ISSN: 0019-4832


  19 in total

1.  A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Johannes B Dahm; Dirk Vogelgesang; Astrid Hummel; Alexander Staudt; Henry Völzke; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Pulse oximetry for evaluation of radial and ulnar arterial blood flow.

Authors:  A R Hovagim; R I Katz; P J Poppers
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth       Date:  1989-02

3.  Use of the Allen's test and transradial catheterization.

Authors:  David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Vascular communications of the hand in patients being considered for transradial coronary angiography: is the Allen's test accurate?

Authors:  Michael J Greenwood; Anthony J Della-Siega; Eric B Fretz; David Kinloch; Peter Klinke; Richard Mildenberger; Malcolm B Williams; David Hilton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience.

Authors:  Jonas Eichhöfer; Eric Horlick; Joan Ivanov; Peter H Seidelin; John R Ross; Douglas Ing; Paul Daly; Karen Mackie; Brenda Ridley; Leonard Schwartz; Alan Barolet; Vladimír Dzavík
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Comparison of the effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.

Authors:  Samir B Pancholy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Anxiety score as a risk factor for radial artery vasospasm during radial interventions: a pilot study.

Authors:  Suleyman Ercan; Ahmet Unal; Gokhan Altunbas; Hilal Kaya; Vedat Davutoglu; Murat Yuce; Orhan Ozer
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Michel Bertrand; Antonio Colombo; George Dangas; Michael E Farkouh; Frederick Feit; Alexandra J Lansky; A Michael Lincoff; Roxana Mehran; Jeffrey W Moses; Magnus Ohman; Harvey D White
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

Authors:  Martin Brueck; Dirk Bandorski; Wilfried Kramer; Marcus Wieczorek; Reinhard Höltgen; Harald Tillmanns
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Fang-Shu Ou; Tracy Y Wang; Matthew T Roe; Ralph Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.195

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures.

Authors:  Dev Basu; Preet Mohinder Singh; Anubhooti Tiwari; Basavana Goudra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-03-28

2.  The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study.

Authors:  Rajendra K Gokhroo; Kailash Chandra; Rajesh Nandal; Devendra S Bisht; Sajal Gupta; Kamal Kishor; A Avinash; Shashikant Pandey; Ramsagar Roy; Ashish Phogat; Tarik Mohammad Tasleem; Anushri Kaul
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-06-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.