Literature DB >> 24814090

Etrolizumab as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

Séverine Vermeire1, Sharon O'Byrne2, Mary Keir2, Marna Williams2, Timothy T Lu2, John C Mansfield3, Christopher A Lamb3, Brian G Feagan4, Julian Panes5, Azucena Salas5, Daniel C Baumgart6, Stefan Schreiber7, Iris Dotan8, William J Sandborn9, Gaik W Tew2, Diana Luca2, Meina T Tang2, Lauri Diehl2, Jeffrey Eastham-Anderson2, Gert De Hertogh10, Clementine Perrier10, Jackson G Egen2, John A Kirby3, Gert van Assche11, Paul Rutgeerts10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the β7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4β7 and αEβ7. We aimed to assess etrolizumab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 study, patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who had not responded to conventional therapy were recruited from 40 referral centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients (aged 18-75 years; Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] of 5 of higher [or ≥6 in USA]; and disease extending 25 cm or more from anal verge) were randomised (1:1:1) to one of two dose levels of subcutaneous etrolizumab (100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, with placebo at week 2; or 420 mg loading dose [LD] at week 0 followed by 300 mg at weeks 2, 4, and 8), or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at week 10, defined as MCS of 2 or less (with no individual subscore of >1), analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; all randomly assigned patients who had received at least one dose of study drug, had at least one post-baseline disease-activity assessment, and had a centrally read screening endoscopic subscore of ≥2). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01336465.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2011, and July 11, 2012, 124 patients were randomly assigned, of whom five had a endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 and were excluded from the mITT population, leaving 39 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group, 39 in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group, and 41 in the placebo group for the primary analyses. No patients in the placebo group had clinical remission at week 10, compared with eight (21% [95% CI 7-36]) patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (p=0·0040) and four (10% [0·2-24]) patients in the 300 mg plus LD group (p=0·048). Adverse events occurred in 25 (61%) of 41 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (five [12%] of which were regarded as serious), 19 (48%) of 40 patients in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group (two [5%] serious), and 31 (72%) of 43 patients in the placebo group (five [12%] serious).
INTERPRETATION: Etrolizumab was more likely to lead to clinical remission at week 10 than was placebo. Therefore, blockade of both α4β7 and αEβ7 might provide a unique therapeutic approach for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and phase 3 studies have been planned. FUNDING: Genentech.
Copyright © 2014 Vermeire et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814090     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60661-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  130 in total

Review 1.  Biologic agents for IBD: practical insights.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Lucine Vuitton; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Current, new and future biological agents on the horizon for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Aurelien Amiot; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 3.  Pathway-based approaches to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Giorgos Bamias; Theresa T Pizarro; Fabio Cominelli
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  An early-biomarker algorithm predicts lethal graft-versus-host disease and survival.

Authors:  Matthew J Hartwell; Umut Özbek; Ernst Holler; Anne S Renteria; Hannah Major-Monfried; Pavan Reddy; Mina Aziz; William J Hogan; Francis Ayuk; Yvonne A Efebera; Elizabeth O Hexner; Udomsak Bunworasate; Muna Qayed; Rainer Ordemann; Matthias Wölfl; Stephan Mielke; Attaphol Pawarode; Yi-Bin Chen; Steven Devine; Andrew C Harris; Madan Jagasia; Carrie L Kitko; Mark R Litzow; Nicolaus Kröger; Franco Locatelli; George Morales; Ryotaro Nakamura; Ran Reshef; Wolf Rösler; Daniela Weber; Kitsada Wudhikarn; Gregory A Yanik; John E Levine; James Lm Ferrara
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-02-09

5.  Targeting Beta-7 Integrins for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Jesus Rivera-Nieves
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-07

Review 6.  The Impact of Therapeutic Antibodies on the Management of Digestive Diseases: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions.

Authors:  M Anthony Sofia; David T Rubin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Current and Future Targets for Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Raja Atreya; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 8.  Ulcerative Colitis: Update on Medical Management.

Authors:  Heba N Iskandar; Tanvi Dhere; Francis A Farraye
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-11

Review 9.  Treatment of IBD: where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  The current state of the art for biological therapies and new small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Sudarshan Paramsothy; Adam K Rosenstein; Saurabh Mehandru; Jean-Frederic Colombel
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 7.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.