Literature DB >> 24813972

Evaluation of outcomes after implementation of an induction-of-labor protocol.

Jessica Rhinehart-Ventura1, Catherine Eppes1, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar1, Christina Davidson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether adherence to an induction of labor (IOL) protocol decreases the rate of failed IOL (FIOL). STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a 1-year retrospective chart review around the implementation of a hospital IOL protocol and compared maternal and neonatal outcomes from deliveries managed per protocol (n = 369) with those deliveries that were not (n = 230). Women at least 24 weeks' gestation with cervical dilation up to 2 cm who underwent an indicated IOL were included. Protocol-adherent (PA) inductions had amniotomy within 24 hours of starting oxytocin, intrauterine pressure catheter placement in latent labor, Montevideo units titrated to 200-300 or to adequate cervical change, and oxytocin administered for at least 12 hours after amniotomy before FIOL was diagnosed (defined as delivery by cesarean during latent labor as a result of failure to enter active labor). The primary outcome was the rate of FIOL. Control for possible confounders was made by stratification and multivariate modeling.
RESULTS: FIOL rates were lowest in the PA group, which remained significant after stratification on parity and multivariate analysis (nulliparous women, 3.8% vs 9.8%; P = .043; multiparous women, 0% vs 6%; P < .0004). Median time to delivery was shortest in the PA group by 3.5 hours in nulliparous women (16.0 vs 19.5 hours, respectively; P = .0002) and 1.5 hours in multiparous women (10.75 vs 12.25 hours, respectively; P < .0001). There were no differences in infectious morbidity or neonatal outcomes between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Adherence to a standardized IOL protocol is associated with a decreased rate of FIOL and length of labor.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  failed induction of labor; induction-of-labor protocol; time to delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813972     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  2 in total

1.  Defining failed induction of labor.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cesarean rates according to the Robson classification: analysis in a municipal maternity in São Paulo.

Authors:  Gabriela Guimarães Franco Ramos; Eduardo Zlotnik; Adolfo Wenjaw Liao
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.