Literature DB >> 24813776

Outcome following lingual nerve repair with vein graft cuff: a preliminary report.

Shigeyuki Fujita1, Itaru Tojyo2, Masai Yamada3, Yoshihiko Go3, Takashi Matsumoto3, Norifumi Kiga4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The object of this study was to assess the effects of an inside-out vein graft as a cuff after direct suture on human lingual nerve regeneration and recovery after iatrogenic lingual nerve injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with unilateral lingual nerve anesthesia as a complication of iatrogenic injury after third molar extraction underwent microneurosurgical procedures for the injured lingual nerve under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. In group A, after removing the neuromas and peripheral scars surrounding the torn nerves, the 2 nerve ends were sutured without tension. In group B, after the same procedure, including the same suturing procedure, an inside-out vein graft was placed as a cuff after the direct suture. Each group was followed at least once every 6 months for 1 year after the procedure. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the Pogrel criteria, the Sunderland grade, and the British Medical Research Council Scale (MRCS).
RESULTS: There were no particular differences between groups A and B at 6 and 12 months after the operation. However, based on the MRCS criteria, there was a clearly better result in group B than in group A at 6 and 12 months after the operation, and the recovery of gustatory sensation tended to be better in group B than in group A 1 year after the operation.
CONCLUSION: This inside-out vein graft as a cuff after direct suturing may facilitate faster lingual nerve regeneration than the traditional direct suture approach. The inside-out vein graft as a cuff may provide the advantages of preventing axonal escape at the suture lines, minimizing nerve entrapment, and preventing neuroma formation in the space between the sutured nerves.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813776     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  A new treatment for lingual nerve injury: an anatomical feasibility study for using a buccal nerve pedicle graft.

Authors:  Joe Iwanaga; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments of Neurosensory Function after Lingual Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Yukari Shintani; Takashi Nakanishi; Masamichi Ueda; Naoki Mizobata; Itaru Tojyo; Shigeyuki Fujita
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Risk of lingual nerve injuries in removal of mandibular third molars: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Itaru Tojyo; Takashi Nakanishi; Yukari Shintani; Kenjiro Okamoto; Yukihiro Hiraishi; Shigeyuki Fujita
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09-10

4.  A case report of a long-term abandoned torn lingual nerve injury repaired by collagen nerve graft induced by lower third molar extraction.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Fujita; Naoki Mizobata; Takashi Nakanishi; Itaru Tojyo
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12-23

5.  Effect of duration from lingual nerve injury to undergoing microneurosurgery on improving sensory and taste functions: retrospective study.

Authors:  Takashi Nakanishi; Yuta Yamamoto; Kensuke Tanioka; Yukari Shintani; Itaru Tojyo; Shigeyuki Fujita
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12-27

6.  Comparison of prognosis in two methods for the lingual nerve repair: direct suture with vein graft cuff and collagen allograft method.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Fujita; Itaru Tojyo; Takashi Nakanishi; Shigeru Suzuki
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Cavernous nerve reconstruction with autologous vein graft and platelet-derived growth factors.

Authors:  Xie-Gang Ding; Shi-Wen Li; Xin-Min Zheng; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.