Literature DB >> 24813599

Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future.

R Stan Williams1, Kevin J Doody2, Glenn L Schattman3, Eli Y Adashi4.   

Abstract

The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevaluated for their continued ability to afford the public with credible and understandable estimates of conception per initiated cycle. In this Clinical Opinion, we trace the history of the public reporting of ART, describe the recently modified (present day) reporting platform, and explore potential future improvements thereof.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; public reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813599     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  How Infertility Patients and Providers View and Confront Religious and Spiritual Issues.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-02

2.  Male factor infertility: Prediction models for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Public reporting of IVF outcomes influences medical decision-making and physician training.

Authors:  Stephanie Gunderson; Emily S Jungheim; Caleb B Kallen; Kenan Omurtag
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-11

4.  Effect of Embryo Banking on U.S. National Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rates.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Peripartum and postpartum outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancy following ART: a retrospective cohort study from two Italian obstetric units.

Authors:  Silvia Vannuccini; Chiara Ferrata; Federica Perelli; Serena Pinzauti; Filiberto M Severi; Fernando M Reis; Felice Petraglia; Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-07-24

7.  Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Paul A Carpentier; Barbara L Meier; Mark Rollo; Benjamin Tingey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-07-25

9.  Chinese herbal medicine for assisted reproduction technology: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangzhen Xie; Jian Li; Yan Li; Bingmei Wang; Chunyu Xie; Qing Xia; Zhigang Zhang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.