Literature DB >> 24813260

Nanometer-scale features on micrometer-scale surface texturing: a bone histological, gene expression, and nanomechanical study.

Paulo G Coelho1, Tadahiro Takayama2, Daniel Yoo1, Ryo Jimbo3, Sanjay Karunagaran4, Nick Tovar1, Malvin N Janal5, Seiichi Yamano2.   

Abstract

Micro- and nanoscale surface modifications have been the focus of multiple studies in the pursuit of accelerating bone apposition or osseointegration at the implant surface. Here, we evaluated histological and nanomechanical properties, and gene expression, for a microblasted surface presenting nanometer-scale texture within a micrometer-scale texture (MB) (Ossean Surface, Intra-Lock International, Boca Raton, FL) versus a dual-acid etched surface presenting texture at the micrometer-scale only (AA), in a rodent femur model for 1, 2, 4, and 8weeks in vivo. Following animal sacrifice, samples were evaluated in terms of histomorphometry, biomechanical properties through nanoindentation, and gene expression by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Although the histomorphometric, and gene expression analysis results were not significantly different between MB and AA at 4 and 8 weeks, significant differences were seen at 1 and 2 weeks. The expression of the genes encoding collagen type I (COL-1), and osteopontin (OPN) was significantly higher for MB than for AA at 1 week, indicating up-regulated osteoprogenitor and osteoblast differentiation. At 2 weeks, significantly up-regulated expression of the genes for COL-1, runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2), osterix, and osteocalcin (OCN) indicated progressive mineralization in newly formed bone. The nanomechanical properties tested by the nanoindentation presented significantly higher-rank hardness and elastic modulus for the MB compared to AA at all time points tested. In conclusion, the nanotopographical featured surfaces presented an overall higher host-to-implant response compared to the microtextured only surfaces. The statistical differences observed in some of the osteogenic gene expression between the two groups may shed some insight into the role of surface texture and its extent in the observed bone healing mechanisms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene expression; Nanomechanics; Nanotopography; Osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813260     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  12 in total

1.  The Synergistic Effect of Leukocyte Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Micrometer/Nanometer Surface Texturing on Bone Healing around Immediately Placed Implants: An Experimental Study in Dogs.

Authors:  Rodrigo F Neiva; Luiz Fernando Gil; Nick Tovar; Malvin N Janal; Heloisa Fonseca Marao; Estevam Augusto Bonfante; Nelson Pinto; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Titanium Dental Implant Micro-Morphology.

Authors:  Gaetano Marenzi; Filomena Impero; Fabio Scherillo; Josè Camilla Sammartino; Antonino Squillace; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Micro-Nano Surface Characterization and Bioactivity of a Calcium Phosphate-Incorporated Titanium Implant Surface.

Authors:  Fausto Zamparini; Carlo Prati; Luigi Generali; Andrea Spinelli; Paola Taddei; Maria Giovanna Gandolfi
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Histological and Nanomechanical Properties of a New Nanometric Hydroxiapatite Implant Surface. An In Vivo Study in Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Paula G F P Oliveira; Paulo G Coelho; Edmara T P Bergamo; Lukasz Witek; Cristine A Borges; Fábio B Bezerra; Arthur B Novaes; Sergio L S Souza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Immediate restoration of fixed full-arch prostheses placed on implants in both fresh and healed sockets using the flat one-bridge technique: a 7-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Simone Marconcini; Enrica Giammarinaro; Ugo Covani; Andrea Mascolo; Guerino Caso; Marco Del Corso
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Analysis of the Osseointegration Process of Dental Implants by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Elena Kalinnikova; Margarita Sadovnikova; Alexander Rodionov; Fadis Murzakhanov; Peter Grishin
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 7.  Latest Trends in Surface Modification for Dental Implantology: Innovative Developments and Analytical Applications.

Authors:  Francesca Accioni; Juan Vázquez; Manuel Merinero; Belén Begines; Ana Alcudia
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Synergistic effect of nanostructure and calcium ions on improving the bioactivity of titanium implants.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Jingwen Wang; Shahrzad Hosseinijenab; Yiqiang Yu; Chao Lv; Cheng Luo; Weijie Zhang; Xi Sun; Lei Zhang
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.653

9.  New cosurface capacitive stimulators for the development of active osseointegrative implantable devices.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; Ana Marote; T Santos; João Torrão; A Ramos; José A O Simões; Odete A B da Cruz E Silva; Edward P Furlani; Sandra I Vieira; Jorge A F Ferreira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Interaction between Different Implant Surfaces and Liquid Fibrinogen: A Pilot In Vitro Experiment.

Authors:  Catherine X Andrade; Marc Quirynen; David R Rosenberg; Nelson R Pinto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.