Literature DB >> 24813083

Investigation of diagnostic potentials of nine different biomarkers in endometriosis.

Erdem Ozhan1, Arif Kokcu2, Keramettin Yanik3, Murat Gunaydin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic potentials of the serum levels of nine different biomarkers in endometriosis. STUDY
DESIGN: In this case-controlled, prospective clinical study, 80 women underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy with a preliminary diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain, severe secondary dysmenorrhea, infertility, pelvic endometriosis or pelvic mass. The 60 women with confirmed pelvic endometriosis constituted the endometriosis group, and the other 20 women without endometriosis constituted the control group. Preoperative blood samples were obtained for serum biomarker measurements. Serum levels of nine different serum biomarkers including α-enolase, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, leptin, interleukin-8, anti-endometrial antibody, phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase 1, CA125, syntaxin-5, and laminin-1 were measured concurrently and compared between the control and endometriosis groups, and among control group and endometriosis subgroups including stage I, stage II, stage III and stage IV endometriosis.
RESULTS: The serum levels of α-enolase, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, leptin, interleukin-8 and antiendometrial antibodies showed a statistically significant difference neither between control and endometriosis groups nor among control group and endometriosis subgroups. The serum levels of CA125, syntaxin-5 and laminin-1 showed a statistically significant difference both between the control and endometriosis groups (p<0.01) and among control group and endometriosis subgroups (p<0.01). Serum levels of laminin-1 in stage II and IV endometriosis; syntaxin-5 in stage I and II endometriosis; and CA125 in stage III and IV endometriosis were found to have the different levels compared to control group.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the concurrent measurement of CA125, syntaxin-5 and laminin-1 might be a useful non-invasive test in strengthening the diagnosis of endometriosis and in predicting its severity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA125; Endometriosis; Laminin-1; Serum biomarkers; Syntaxin-5

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813083     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  The Eutopic Endometrium Proteome in Endometriosis Reveals Candidate Markers and Molecular Mechanisms of Physiopathology.

Authors:  Loren Méar; Emmanuelle Com; Khadija Fathallah; Laetitia Guillot; Régis Lavigne; Blandine Guével; Arnaud Fauconnier; François Vialard; Charles Pineau
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06

Review 2.  Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Rabia Shaikh; Cindy Farquhar; Vanessa Jordan; Carola S Scheffers; Ben Willem J Mol; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-01

3.  Survivin and VEGF as Novel Biomarkers in Diagnosis of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Milena Acimovic; Snezana Vidakovic; Natasa Milic; Katarina Jeremic; Milos Markovic; Ana Milosevic-Djeric; Gordana Lazovic-Radonjic
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Serum macrophage migration inhibition factor for diagnosing endometriosis and its severity: case-control study.

Authors:  Sahar Mohamed Yehya Elbaradie; Mohamed Sobhy Bakry; Almandouh Hussein Bosilah
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 5.  Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Amelie Fassbender; Richard O Burney; Dorien F O; Thomas D'Hooghe; Linda Giudice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Biomarkers for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Costin Vlad Anastasiu; Marius Alexandru Moga; Andrea Elena Neculau; Andreea Bălan; Ioan Scârneciu; Roxana Maria Dragomir; Ana-Maria Dull; Liana-Maria Chicea
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.