Literature DB >> 24812642

Bone loss patterns in cortical, subcortical, and trabecular compartments during simulated microgravity.

Tomas Cervinka1, Harri Sievänen2, Jari Hyttinen3, Jörn Rittweger4.   

Abstract

Disuse studies provide a useful model for bone adaptation. A direct comparison of these studies is, however, complicated by the different settings used for bone analysis. Through pooling and reanalysis of bone data from previous disuse studies, we determined bone loss and recovery in cortical, subcortical, and trabecular compartments and evaluated whether the study design modulated skeletal adaptation. Peripheral quantitative tomographic (pQCT) images from control groups of four disuse studies with a duration of 24, 35, 56, and 90 days were reanalyzed using a robust threshold-free segmentation algorithm. The pQCT data were available from 27 young healthy men at baseline, and at specified intervals over disuse and reambulation phases. The mean maximum absolute bone loss (mean ± 95% CI) was 6.1 ± 4.5 mg/mm in cortical, 2.4 ± 1.6 mg/mm in subcortical, and 9.8 ± 9.1 mg/mm in trabecular compartments, after 90 days of bed rest. The percentage changes in all bone compartments were, however, similar. During the first few weeks after onset of reambulation, the bone loss rate was systematically greater in the cortical than in the trabecular compartment (P < 0.002), and this was observed in all studies except for the longest study. We conclude that disuse-induced bone losses follow similar patterns irrespective of study design, and the largest mean absolute bone loss occurs in the cortical compartment, but apparently only during the first 60 days. With longer study duration, trabecular loss may become more prominent.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bed rest; image processing; immobilization; osteoporosis; pQCT

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24812642     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00021.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bone loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in persons with spinal cord injury: imaging approaches, risk of fracture, and potential treatment options.

Authors:  C M Cirnigliaro; M J Myslinski; M F La Fountaine; S C Kirshblum; G F Forrest; W A Bauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  More than osteoporosis: age-specific issues in bone health.

Authors:  Kristine M Erlandson; Giovanni Guaraldi; Julian Falutz
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Effect of daily short-duration weight-bearing on disuse-induced deterioration of musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  K-S Leung; Y-H Li; Y Liu; H Wang; K-F Tam; D Hk Chow; Y Wan; S Ling; Z Dai; L Qin; W-H Cheung
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Moderate tibia axial loading promotes discordant response of bone composition parameters and mechanical properties in a hindlimb unloading rat model.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Yang; Ling-Wei Huang; Xiao-Tong Nie; Yue Yang; Zhe Wang; Li Ren; Hui-Yun Xu; Peng Shang
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Dietary countermeasure mitigates simulated spaceflight-induced osteopenia in mice.

Authors:  Sonette Steczina; Candice G T Tahimic; Megan Pendleton; Ons M'Saad; Moniece Lowe; Joshua S Alwood; Bernard P Halloran; Ruth K Globus; Ann-Sofie Schreurs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The effects of microgravity on bone structure and function.

Authors:  Joey Man; Taylor Graham; Georgina Squires-Donelly; Andrew L Laslett
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.970

7.  A comprehensive study of long-term skeletal changes after spinal cord injury in adult rats.

Authors:  Tiao Lin; Wei Tong; Abhishek Chandra; Shao-Yun Hsu; Haoruo Jia; Ji Zhu; Wei-Ju Tseng; Michael A Levine; Yejia Zhang; Shi-Gui Yan; X Sherry Liu; Dongming Sun; Wise Young; Ling Qin
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 8.  Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action.

Authors:  N H Hart; S Nimphius; T Rantalainen; A Ireland; A Siafarikas; R U Newton
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Krakow City, Southern Poland.

Authors:  Sayantani M Basak; Izabela A Wierzbowska; Agnieszka Gajda; Marcin Czarnoleski; Maciej Lesiak; Elzbieta Widera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Differences in the effects of BMI on bone microstructure between loaded and unloaded bones assessed by HR-pQCT in Japanese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Norifumi Fujii; Manabu Tsukamoto; Nobukazu Okimoto; Miyuki Mori; Yoshiaki Ikejiri; Toru Yoshioka; Makoto Kawasaki; Nobuhiro Kito; Junya Ozawa; Ryoichi Nakamura; Shogo Takano; Saeko Fujiwara
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2021-05-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.