| Literature DB >> 24812599 |
Shuji Nomoto1, Mitsuhiro Hishida1, Yoshikuni Inokawa1, Hiroyuki Sugimoto1, Yasuhiro Kodera1.
Abstract
As progression and outcome of relapsed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are distinct from those of a second primary tumor, clonal analyses of initial and recurrent HCCs are thus clinically useful. Although several studies in Japan and Taiwan had shown that the multicentric origin (MO) recurrences were more common than intrahepatic metastases (IM), a recent report from China indicated that IM cases outnumber MO recurrences. In managing HCC cases, both tumor malignancy and background liver function are important considerations (and which we characterize as tumor factors and background liver factors, respectively); they indicate both appropriate treatment, and likely post-surgical outcome. In this editorial, we explain why the report had shown such a different conclusion. We also discuss current management of HCC.Entities:
Keywords: Tumor factors; background liver factors; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); intrahepatic metastases (IM); multicentric origin (MO)
Year: 2014 PMID: 24812599 PMCID: PMC3999425 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.02.13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr ISSN: 2304-3881 Impact factor: 7.293