BACKGROUND: Symptomatic capsular contracture occurs in about 10 % of primary breast augmentations and in more than double that rate in reconstruction after mastectomy, especially in the setting of radiation. Mast cells, traditionally associated with immune response and inflammation, secrete profibrotic mediators and may play a role in capsule formation and contracture. We analyzed the mast cell and fibroblast populations in breast capsule tissue from patients who underwent capsular excision. METHODS: Capsule tissue was collected from patients who underwent exchange of tissue expanders for permanent implants, revision of reconstruction, or revision augmentation. Breast capsule tissues were prepared for histological analyses of mast cells, fibroblasts, and collagen. Mast cells and fibroblasts were isolated from capsule tissue and screened for mediators and receptor expression. RESULTS: In breast capsule tissue, the average numbers of mast cells and fibroblasts were 9 ± 1/mm(2) and 33 ± 10/mm(2), respectively. There were significantly more mast cells on the posterior side than on the anterior side of the capsule tissue (12 ± 2 vs. 6 ± 1/mm(2), p < 0.01). Baker grade IV capsules had an increased number of fibroblasts compared to Baker grade I capsules (93 ± 9 vs. 40 ± 19/mm(2), p < 0.001). In breast capsule tissue, mast cells contained renin, histamine, and TGF-β, and their respective receptors, AT1R, H1R, and TGF-βRI were expressed by fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that within breast capsule tissue mast cells contain mediators that may activate neighboring fibroblasts. Understanding the role of mast cells in pathologic periprosthetic breast capsule formation may lead to novel therapies to prevent and treat capsular contracture. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic capsular contracture occurs in about 10 % of primary breast augmentations and in more than double that rate in reconstruction after mastectomy, especially in the setting of radiation. Mast cells, traditionally associated with immune response and inflammation, secrete profibrotic mediators and may play a role in capsule formation and contracture. We analyzed the mast cell and fibroblast populations in breast capsule tissue from patients who underwent capsular excision. METHODS: Capsule tissue was collected from patients who underwent exchange of tissue expanders for permanent implants, revision of reconstruction, or revision augmentation. Breast capsule tissues were prepared for histological analyses of mast cells, fibroblasts, and collagen. Mast cells and fibroblasts were isolated from capsule tissue and screened for mediators and receptor expression. RESULTS: In breast capsule tissue, the average numbers of mast cells and fibroblasts were 9 ± 1/mm(2) and 33 ± 10/mm(2), respectively. There were significantly more mast cells on the posterior side than on the anterior side of the capsule tissue (12 ± 2 vs. 6 ± 1/mm(2), p < 0.01). Baker grade IV capsules had an increased number of fibroblasts compared to Baker grade I capsules (93 ± 9 vs. 40 ± 19/mm(2), p < 0.001). In breast capsule tissue, mast cells contained renin, histamine, and TGF-β, and their respective receptors, AT1R, H1R, and TGF-βRI were expressed by fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that within breast capsule tissue mast cells contain mediators that may activate neighboring fibroblasts. Understanding the role of mast cells in pathologic periprosthetic breast capsule formation may lead to novel therapies to prevent and treat capsular contracture. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.
Authors: Mimi R Borrelli; Dre Irizzary; Ronak A Patel; Dung Nguyen; Arash Momeni; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan Journal: Aesthet Surg J Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Ralf Berger; Jurandir Marcondes Ribas Filho; Marcelo Augusto de Souza; Pedro Henrique de Paula; João Gabriel Cavazzani Doubek; Rafael de Castro E Souza Pires; Paulo Afonso Nunes Nassif; Eduardo Nascimento Silva Journal: Acta Cir Bras Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 1.564
Authors: Andreas Larsen; Louise E Rasmussen; Leonia F Rasmussen; Tim K Weltz; Mathilde N Hemmingsen; Steen S Poulsen; Jens C B Jacobsen; Peter Vester-Glowinski; Mikkel Herly Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: Patrina S P Poh; Verena Schmauss; Jacqui A McGovern; Daniel Schmauss; Mohit P Chhaya; Peter Foehr; Markus Seeger; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Martijn van Griensven; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Elizabeth R Balmayor Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.175