Literature DB >> 24811848

Parents' knowledge and perspective of optical methods for myopia control in children.

Sin-Wan Cheung1, Christie Lam, Pauline Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To solicit parents' knowledge on myopia control strategies available; to investigate their attitudes toward the use of orthokeratology (ortho-k), daily wear soft lenses, and spectacles for myopia control, assuming all three optical strategies were equally effective for myopia control; and to collect their opinion on the age at which children can commence contact lens wear for vision correction.
METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted on parents who responded to the advertisement for two myopia control studies, one on ortho-k and one on soft lenses.
RESULTS: Most of the 196 respondents (ortho-k group, 56%; soft lens group, 44%) were mothers, aged 36 to 45 years. Ortho-k was the most commonly known myopia control strategy (86%). Parents in the ortho-k group selected ortho-k (49%) and spectacles (45%) (p < 0.001) as their preferred myopia control strategy, whereas parents in the soft lens group had no preference (p = 0.57). Decision was affected by prior knowledge of myopia control strategy. Major considerations were convenience and safety among parents selecting contact lenses and spectacles, respectively, as their preferred options. Overall, because of the lack of confidence in safety in contact lens wear, most parents (75%) were of the opinion that contact lenses for vision correction were only for children older than 14 years (53%) and not indicated for children younger than 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents in Hong Kong were open to the use of contact lenses for myopia control in young children and they appeared to regard myopia control contact lenses as "treatment" and not as visual aids. They were more conservative in the use of contact lenses for vision correction in children. Parents' decision in selecting a myopia control strategy, assuming all three strategies to be equally effective, was affected by an individual's concerns of safety and additional benefits as well as influenced by positive evidence on myopia control effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811848     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Investigation of children's habits of smartphone usage and parental awareness of myopia control in underdeveloped areas of China.

Authors:  An-Qi He; Si-An Liu; Sheng-Yu He; Huan Yao; Pei Chen; Yan Li; Jin Qiu; Ke-Ming Yu; Jing Zhuang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Weekly Changes in Axial Length and Choroidal Thickness in Children During and Following Orthokeratology Treatment With Different Compression Factors.

Authors:  Jason K Lau; Kin Wan; Sin-Wan Cheung; Stephen J Vincent; Pauline Cho
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Orthokeratology with increased compression factor (OKIC): study design and preliminary results.

Authors:  Kin Wan; Jason Ki-Kit Lau; Sin Wan Cheung; Pauline Cho
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Assessment of Satisfaction, Compliance and Side Effects among Long-Term Orthokeratology Wearers.

Authors:  Shang-Yen Wu; Jen-Hung Wang; Cheng-Jen Chiu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The Synergistic Effects of Orthokeratology and Atropine in Slowing the Progression of Myopia.

Authors:  Lei Wan; Chang-Ching Wei; Chih Sheng Chen; Ching-Yao Chang; Chao-Jen Lin; Jamie Jiin-Yi Chen; Peng-Tai Tien; Hui-Ju Lin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Level of Compliance in Orthokeratology.

Authors:  Jiang Jun; Bian Zhiwen; Wang Feifu; Lian Lili; Lu Fan
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.018

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.