Literature DB >> 24811463

The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars.

João Eurico Fonseca, João Gonçalves, Filipe Araújo, Inês Cordeiro, Filipa Teixeira, Helena Canhão, José António Pereira da Silva, Sandra Garcês, Luís Cunha Miranda, Sofia Ramiro, Ana Roxo, Fernando M Pimentel-Santos, Viviana Tavares, Adriano Neto, Alexandre Sepriano, Armando Malcata, Augusto Faustino, Cândida Silva, Catarina Ambrósio, Cátia Duarte, Cláudia Miguel, Filipe Barcelos, Helena Santos, Inês Cunha, João Carlos Ramos, José António Melo Gomes, José Bravo Pimentão, Lúcia Costa, Luís Maurício, Margarida Silva, Miguel Bernardes, Mónica Bogas, Paulo Clemente Coelho, Paulo Monteiro, Renata Aguiar, Rui André, Rui Leitão, Sofia Pimenta, Tiago Meirinhos, Susana Fernandes, Vera Las, Walter Castelão.   

Abstract

Biotechnological drugs have become a fundamental resource for the treatment of rheumatic patients. Patent expiry of some of these drugs created the opportunity for biopharmaceutical manufacturers to develop biosimilar drugs intended to be as efficacious as the originator product but with a lower cost to healthcare systems. Due to the complex manufacturing process and highly intricate structure of biologicals, a biosimilar can never be an exact copy of its reference product. Consequently, regulatory authorities issued strict preclinical and clinical guidelines to ensure safety and efficacy equivalence and, in September 2013, the biosimilar of infliximab was the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody to be authorized for use in the European Union. The current document is a position statement of the "Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia" (Portuguese Society of Rheumatology) on the use of biosimilar drugs in rheumatic diseases. Two systematic literature reviews were performed, one concerning clinical trials and the other one concerning international position papers on biosimilars. The results were presented and discussed in a national meeting and a final position document was discussed, written and approved by Portuguese rheumatologists. Briefly, this position statement is contrary to automatic substitution of the originator by the biosimilar, defends either a different INN or the prescription by brand name, supports that switching between biosimilars and the originator molecule should be done after at least 6 months of treatment and based on the attending physician decision and after adequate patient information, recommends the registration of all biosimilar treated patients in Reuma.pt for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity surveillance, following the strategy already ongoing for originators, and opposes to extrapolation of indications approved to the originator to completely different diseases and/or age groups without adequate pre-clinical, safety or efficacy data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Reumatol Port        ISSN: 0303-464X            Impact factor:   1.290


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biologics registers in RA: methodological aspects, current role and future applications.

Authors:  Elena Nikiphorou; Maya H Buch; Kimme L Hyrich
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Biosimilar DMARDs: What Does the Future Hold?

Authors:  Filipe Araújo; João Gonçalves; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology.

Authors:  Thomas Dörner; Vibeke Strand; Paul Cornes; João Gonçalves; László Gulácsi; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Josef Smolen; Yoshiya Tanaka; Gerd R Burmester
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Monoclonal Antibody and Fusion Protein Biosimilars Across Therapeutic Areas: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.

Authors:  Ira Jacobs; Danielle Petersel; Lesley G Shane; Chee-Keng Ng; Carol Kirchhoff; Gregory Finch; Sadiq Lula
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 5.  Ten years of biosimilars in Europe: development and evolution of the regulatory pathways.

Authors:  Martin Schiestl; Markus Zabransky; Fritz Sörgel
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Addressing Inequality of Access to Biologics: What Is Your Role? A Patient (Advocate)'s Perspective on Biosimilars.

Authors:  Maria M Piggin
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 7.  Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Carlos Pineda; Gilberto Castañeda Hernández; Ira A Jacobs; Daniel F Alvarez; Claudio Carini
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 8.  Epoetin Biosimilars in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: 10 Years' Experience Gained.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Andriy Krendyukov; Martin Schiestl; Pere Gascón
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 9.  Biosimilars in rheumatology: recommendations for regulation and use in Middle Eastern countries.

Authors:  Bassel El Zorkany; Nizar Al Ani; Samar Al Emadi; Jamal Al Saleh; Imad Uthman; Yasser El Dershaby; Mohamed Mounir; Hani Al Moallim
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.980

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.