Quirino Lai1, Jan P Lerut. 1. Starzl Unit of Abdominal Transplantation, University Hospitals St. Luc, Université catholique Louvain - UCL, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Milan criteria are still considered to be the best ones to select patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) for liver transplantation. Although the Milan criteria allowed lowering the incidence of tumor recurrence to a remarkable 10%, there is growing evidence that high numbers of patients were unrightfully excluded from a curative liver transplantation when exceeding these criteria. New strategies have been advocated during recent years with the intent not only to enlarge the number of potential transplant candidates, but also to select recipients with the lowest biological risk of recurrence. RECENT FINDINGS: Different 'biological' and 'dynamic' parameters have been proposed both in western and eastern scenarios, such as α-fetoprotein dynamics, radiological response to locoregional treatments and several inflammatory markers, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio being the most promising one. SUMMARY: The paradigm that HCC patients should be selected according to morphological aspects (tumor numbers and diameters) only, based on the almost 20-year old success story of the Milan criteria, should be modified by combining these parameters with newer biological tumor markers in order to further refine the selection for liver transplantation. Such therapeutic algorithm will allow to further improve selection for and thus outcome after liver transplantation for HCC patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Milan criteria are still considered to be the best ones to select patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) for liver transplantation. Although the Milan criteria allowed lowering the incidence of tumor recurrence to a remarkable 10%, there is growing evidence that high numbers of patients were unrightfully excluded from a curative liver transplantation when exceeding these criteria. New strategies have been advocated during recent years with the intent not only to enlarge the number of potential transplant candidates, but also to select recipients with the lowest biological risk of recurrence. RECENT FINDINGS: Different 'biological' and 'dynamic' parameters have been proposed both in western and eastern scenarios, such as α-fetoprotein dynamics, radiological response to locoregional treatments and several inflammatory markers, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio being the most promising one. SUMMARY: The paradigm that HCCpatients should be selected according to morphological aspects (tumor numbers and diameters) only, based on the almost 20-year old success story of the Milan criteria, should be modified by combining these parameters with newer biological tumor markers in order to further refine the selection for liver transplantation. Such therapeutic algorithm will allow to further improve selection for and thus outcome after liver transplantation for HCCpatients.
Authors: Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Giovanni Vennarecci; Roberto Santoro; Pasquale Lepiane; Marco Colasanti; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Marco Colasanti; Roberto Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.293