Literature DB >> 24811387

Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making.

Rafael Polanía1, Ian Krajbich2, Marcus Grueschow3, Christian C Ruff4.   

Abstract

Organisms make two types of decisions on a regular basis. Perceptual decisions are determined by objective states of the world (e.g., melons are bigger than apples), whereas value-based decisions are determined by subjective preferences (e.g., I prefer apples to melons). Theoretical accounts suggest that both types of choice involve neural computations accumulating evidence for the choice alternatives; however, little is known about the overlap or differences in the processes underlying perceptual versus value-based decisions. We analyzed EEG recordings during a paradigm where perceptual- and value-based choices were based on identical stimuli. For both types of choice, evidence accumulation was evident in parietal gamma-frequency oscillations, whereas a similar frontal signal was unique for value-based decisions. Fronto-parietal synchronization of these signals predicted value-based choice accuracy. These findings uncover how decisions emerge from topographic- and frequency-specific oscillations that accumulate distinct aspects of evidence, with large-scale synchronization as a mechanism integrating these spatially distributed signals.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811387     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  54 in total

1.  Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.

Authors:  Bin Lou; Wha-Yin Hsu; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Irrational time allocation in decision-making.

Authors:  Bastiaan Oud; Ian Krajbich; Kevin Miller; Jin Hyun Cheong; Matthew Botvinick; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Mental representations distinguish value-based decisions from perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Ian Krajbich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 6.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Value-based decision making under uncertainty in hoarding and obsessive- compulsive disorders.

Authors:  Helen Pushkarskaya; David Tolin; Lital Ruderman; Daniel Henick; J MacLaren Kelly; Christopher Pittenger; Ifat Levy
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value.

Authors:  Pradyumna Sepulveda; Marius Usher; Ned Davies; Amy A Benson; Pietro Ortoleva; Benedetto De Martino
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.