Literature DB >> 24810743

How different is the composition of the fouling layer of wastewater reuse and seawater desalination RO membranes?

Muhammad Tariq Khan1, Markus Busch2, Veronica Garcia Molina2, Abdul-Hamid Emwas3, Cyril Aubry4, Jean-Philippe Croue5.   

Abstract

To study the effect of water quality and operating parameters on membrane fouling, a comparative analysis of wastewater (WW) and seawater (SW) fouled reverse osmosis (RO) membranes was conducted. Membranes were harvested from SWRO and WWRO pilot plants located in Vilaseca (East Spain), both using ultrafiltration as pretreatment. The SWRO unit was fed with Mediterranean seawater and the WWRO unit was operated using secondary effluent collected from the municipal wastewater treatment plant. Lead and terminal SWRO and WWRO modules were autopsied after five months and three months of operation, respectively. Ultrastructural, chemical, and microbiological analyses of the fouling layers were performed. Results showed that the WWRO train had mainly bio/organic fouling at the lead position element and inorganic fouling at terminal position element, whereas SWRO train had bio/organic fouling at both end position elements. In the case of WWRO membranes, Betaproteobacteria was the major colonizing species; while Ca, S, and P were the major present inorganic elements. The microbial population of SWRO membranes was mainly represented by Alpha and Gammaproteobacteria. Ca, Fe, and S were the main identified inorganic elements of the fouling layer of SWRO membranes. These results confirmed that the RO fouling layer composition is strongly impacted by the source water quality.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Membrane fouling; Reverse osmosis; Seawater desalination; Wastewater reuse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810743     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse.

Authors:  David M Warsinger; Sudip Chakraborty; Emily W Tow; Megan H Plumlee; Christopher Bellona; Savvina Loutatidou; Leila Karimi; Anne M Mikelonis; Andrea Achilli; Abbas Ghassemi; Lokesh P Padhye; Shane A Snyder; Stefano Curcio; Chad Vecitis; Hassan A Arafat; John H Lienhard
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 2.  Roles of Sulfites in Reverse Osmosis (RO) Plants and Adverse Effects in RO Operation.

Authors:  Yasushi Maeda
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Efficiencies and mechanisms of the chemical cleaning of fouled polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes during the microfiltration of alkali/surfactant/polymer flooding oilfield wastewater.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Shuili Yu; Youbing Zhu; Yu Shen; Xu Gao; Wenxin Shi; Joo Hwa Tay
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Extraction, Characterization, and Anticoagulant Activity of a Sulfated Polysaccharide from Bursatella leachii Viscera.

Authors:  Manel Dhahri; Salim Sioud; Rihab Dridi; Mohsen Hassine; Naceur A Boughattas; Fatimah Almulhim; Zeyad Al Talla; Mariusz Jaremko; Abdul-Hamid M Emwas
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-06-10

5.  Membrane Water Treatment for Drinking Water Production from an Industrial Effluent Used in the Manufacturing of Food Additives.

Authors:  Karina Hernández; Claudia Muro; Oscar Monroy; Vianney Diaz-Blancas; Yolanda Alvarado; María Del Carmen Diaz
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29

6.  Physicochemical Properties of Extracellular Polymeric Substances Produced by Three Bacterial Isolates From Biofouled Reverse Osmosis Membranes.

Authors:  Zahid Ur Rehman; Johannes S Vrouwenvelder; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.