Literature DB >> 24810709

Genetic comparisons yield insight into the evolution of enamel thickness during human evolution.

Julie E Horvath1, Gowri L Ramachandran2, Olivier Fedrigo3, William J Nielsen4, Courtney C Babbitt5, Elizabeth M St Clair2, Lisa W Pfefferle4, Jukka Jernvall6, Gregory A Wray7, Christine E Wall8.   

Abstract

Enamel thickness varies substantially among extant hominoids and is a key trait with significance for interpreting dietary adaptation, life history trajectory, and phylogenetic relationships. There is a strong link in humans between enamel formation and mutations in the exons of the four genes that code for the enamel matrix proteins and the associated protease. The evolution of thick enamel in humans may have included changes in the regulation of these genes during tooth development. The cis-regulatory region in the 5' flank (upstream non-coding region) of MMP20, which codes for enamelysin, the predominant protease active during enamel secretion, has previously been shown to be under strong positive selection in the lineages leading to both humans and chimpanzees. Here we examine evidence for positive selection in the 5' flank and 3' flank of AMELX, AMBN, ENAM, and MMP20. We contrast the human sequence changes with other hominoids (chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, gibbons) and rhesus macaques (outgroup), a sample comprising a range of enamel thickness. We find no evidence for positive selection in the protein-coding regions of any of these genes. In contrast, we find strong evidence for positive selection in the 5' flank region of MMP20 and ENAM along the lineage leading to humans, and in both the 5' flank and 3' flank regions of MMP20 along the lineage leading to chimpanzees. We also identify putative transcription factor binding sites overlapping some of the species-specific nucleotide sites and we refine which sections of the up- and downstream putative regulatory regions are most likely to harbor important changes. These non-coding changes and their potential for differential regulation by transcription factors known to regulate tooth development may offer insight into the mechanisms that allow for rapid evolutionary changes in enamel thickness across closely-related species, and contribute to our understanding of the enamel phenotype in hominoids.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMBN; AMELX; ENAM; MMP20; Primate comparative genomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810709     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  9 in total

1.  Human enamel thickness and ENAM polymorphism.

Authors:  Diane M Daubert; Joanna L Kelley; Yuriy G Udod; Carolina Habor; Chris G Kleist; Ilona K Furman; Igor N Tikonov; Willie J Swanson; Frank A Roberts
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.344

2.  Association between ENAM polymorphisms and dental caries in children.

Authors:  Darshan Devang Divakar; Sultan Ali S Alanazi; Mohammed Yahya A Assiri; Shahad Mohammed Halawani; Saleh Zaid Alshehri; Saeed Ahmed Saeed Al-Amri; Mohammed Mustafa
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Modeling enamel matrix secretion in mammalian teeth.

Authors:  Teemu J Häkkinen; S Susanna Sova; Ian J Corfe; Leo Tjäderhane; Antti Hannukainen; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Qualitative assessment of the dental groove pattern and its uniqueness for forensic identification.

Authors:  Jyotirmoy Roy; Muraleedharan M Rohith; Debesh Nilendu; Abraham Johnson
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

5.  Internal Tooth Structure and Burial Practices: Insights into the Neolithic Necropolis of Gurgy (France, 5100-4000 cal. BC).

Authors:  Mona Le Luyer; Michael Coquerelle; Stéphane Rottier; Priscilla Bayle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neanderthal and Denisova tooth protein variants in present-day humans.

Authors:  Clément Zanolli; Mathilde Hourset; Rémi Esclassan; Catherine Mollereau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Positive Selection Linked with Generation of Novel Mammalian Dentition Patterns.

Authors:  João Paulo Machado; Siby Philip; Emanuel Maldonado; Stephen J O'Brien; Warren E Johnson; Agostinho Antunes
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Crown tissue proportions and enamel thickness distribution in the Middle Pleistocene hominin molars from Sima de los Huesos (SH) population (Atapuerca, Spain).

Authors:  Laura Martín-Francés; María Martinón-Torres; Marina Martínez de Pinillos; Cecilia García-Campos; Clément Zanolli; Priscilla Bayle; Mario Modesto-Mata; Juan Luis Arsuaga; José María Bermúdez de Castro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Molecular Evolution of Tooth-Related Genes Provides New Insights into Dietary Adaptations of Mammals.

Authors:  Yuan Mu; Ran Tian; Linlin Xiao; Di Sun; Zepeng Zhang; Shixia Xu; Guang Yang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.395

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.