Literature DB >> 24810704

Development of a new lingual range-of-motion assessment scale: normative data in surgically treated oral cancer patients.

C L Lazarus1, H Husaini, A S Jacobson, J K Mojica, D Buchbinder, D Okay, M L Urken.   

Abstract

Surgical resection in oral cancer patients can result in altered speech, swallowing, and patient perception of quality of life (QOL). Oral surgery can result in reduced lingual range of motion (ROM). However, few studies have quantified the degree of lingual restriction after surgery. This pilot study describes a new measurement system to define tongue ROM in surgically treated tongue cancer patients. This measurement system was validated by comparing results in these treated surgical patients versus healthy individuals. This scale was further validated by correlating ROM with performance status, oral outcomes, and patient-rated QOL. Thirty-six patients who underwent oral tongue surgery and 31 healthy individuals were included. Tongue ROM was assessed using a novel ROM assessment system. This novel system was examined in these patients versus healthy subjects. This measurement tool was further validated by correlating tongue ROM in treated patients with performance status, oral outcomes, and patient-rated QOL. Tongue ROM was found to be significantly lower in the surgically treated patients than in the healthy individuals (p = 0.0001). Tongue ROM correlated with performance status, oral outcomes, and all QOL measures. This new tongue ROM measurement system defined tongue deficits in surgically treated oral cancer patients. This tool was validated by comparing results to those in healthy individuals, as well as by correlating tongue ROM to performance status, oral outcomes, and QOL. This measurement tool can be used to define baseline and postsurgery tongue ROM in oral cancer patients, as well as track change over time with recovery and therapy. Future studies should examine use of this measurement tool with other populations demonstrating tongue deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810704     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9534-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  45 in total

1.  Limited mouth opening after primary therapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Weber; Steffen Dommerich; Hans Wilhelm Pau; Burkhard Kramp
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09

2.  Improvement of speech intelligibility by a secondary operation to mobilize the tongue after glossectomy.

Authors:  K Michi; S Imai; Y Yamashita; N Suzuki
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A comparison of whole mouth resting and stimulated salivary measurement procedures.

Authors:  M Navazesh; C M Christensen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Can an oral mechanism examination contribute to the assessment of odds of aspiration?

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Debra M Suiter; Joseph Murray; Alfred W Rademaker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  An exploratory study of the influence of clinico-demographic variables on swallowing and swallowing-related quality of life in a cohort of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with primary surgery.

Authors:  Raghav C Dwivedi; Edward J Chisholm; Afroze S Khan; Nicholas J Harris; Shree A Bhide; Suzanne St Rose; Cyrus J Kerawala; Peter M Clarke; Christopher M Nutting; Peter H Rhys-Evans; Kevin J Harrington; Rehan Kazi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A systematic approach to functional reconstruction of the oral cavity following partial and total glossectomy.

Authors:  M L Urken; J F Moscoso; W Lawson; H F Biller
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-06

7.  Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; F M McConnel; D Stein; Q Beery; J Johnson; M A Heiser; S Cardinale; D Shedd
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Prevalence of perceived dysphagia and quality-of-life impairment in a geriatric population.

Authors:  Po-Hung Chen; Justin S Golub; Edie R Hapner; Michael M Johns
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing.

Authors:  F M McConnel; B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; L Colangelo; D Shedd; W Carroll; J Lewin; J Johnson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-06

10.  Long-term subjective functional outcome of surgery plus postoperative radiotheraphy for advanced stage oral cavity and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; J Gaynor; D Kraus; E W Strong; J P Shah; L B Harrison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  A New Accurate 3D Measurement Tool to Assess the Range of Motion of the Tongue in Oral Cancer Patients: A Standardized Model.

Authors:  Simone van Dijk; Maarten J A van Alphen; Irene Jacobi; Ludwig E Smeele; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  A survey of variables used by speech-language pathologists to assess function and predict functional recovery in oral cancer patients.

Authors:  Hasan Husaini; Gintas P Krisciunas; Susan Langmore; Jacqueline K Mojica; Mark L Urken; Adam S Jacobson; Cathy L Lazarus
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Objective and subjective hyposalivation after treatment for head and neck cancer: Long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ilya Likhterov; Meng Ru; Cindy Ganz; Mark L Urken; Raymond Chai; Devin Okay; Jerry Liu; Robert Stewart; Bruce Culliney; Daisy Palacios; Cathy L Lazarus
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  The effects of tongue stretching exercise on tongue length in healthy adults: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Won-Jin Kim; Jong-Bae Choi; Ji-Su Park; Sang-Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-11-24

5.  Quantification of tongue mobility impairment using optical tracking in patients after receiving primary surgery or chemoradiation.

Authors:  K D R Kappert; M J A van Alphen; L E Smeele; A J M Balm; F van der Heijden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Five Specific Tongue Movements in a Healthy Population.

Authors:  Kilian D R Kappert; Simone van Dijk; David Wellenstein; Maarten J A van Alphen; Rob J J H van Son; Ludi E Smeele; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Manual Therapy for Fibrosis-Related Late Effect Dysphagia in head and neck cancer survivors: the pilot MANTLE trial.

Authors:  Katherine Hutcheson; Holly McMillan; Carla Warneke; Christine Porsche; Kiara Savage; Sheila Buoy; Jihong Wang; Karin Woodman; Stephen Lai; Clifton Fuller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.