| Literature DB >> 24809025 |
Amélie Deredjian1, Céline Colinon1, Edmond Hien2, Elisabeth Brothier1, Benjamin Youenou1, Benoit Cournoyer1, Samuel Dequiedt3, Alain Hartmann4, Claudy Jolivet5, Sabine Houot6, Lionel Ranjard3, Nicolas P A Saby5, Sylvie Nazaret1.
Abstract
The occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was monitored at a broad spatial scale in French agricultural soils, from various soil types and under various land uses to evaluate the ability of soil to be a natural habitat for that species. To appreciate the impact of agricultural practices on the potential dispersion of P. aeruginosa, we further investigated the impact of organic amendment at experimental sites in France and Burkina Faso. A real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) approach was used to analyze a set of 380 samples selected within the French RMQS ("Réseau de Mesures de la Qualité des Sols") soil library. In parallel, a culture-dependent approach was tested on a subset of samples. The results showed that P. aeruginosa was very rarely detected suggesting a sporadic presence of this bacterium in soils from France and Burkina Faso, whatever the structural and physico-chemical characteristics or climate. When we analyzed the impact of organic amendment on the prevalence of P. aeruginosa, we found that even if it was detectable in various manures (at levels from 10(3) to 10(5) CFU or DNA targets (g drywt)(-1) of sample), it was hardly ever detected in the corresponding soils, which raises questions about its survival. The only case reports were from a vineyard soil amended with a compost of mushroom manure in Burgundy, and a few samples from two fields amended with raw urban wastes in the sub-urban area of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. In these soils the levels of culturable cells were below 10 CFU (g drywt)(-1).Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; cultivation; organic amendment; qPCR; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24809025 PMCID: PMC4010769 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Sites studied in France. (A) Soils used for qPCR and culture-based detection of P. aeruginosa. (B) Soils that received or not organic amendment.
Number of CFU (colony forming units) of .
| Alsace | |||
| Colmar-INRA | Wet bovine manure | 3 | 2.7 (±0.47) |
| Wet compost of bovine manure | 3 | 0 | |
| Bassin Parisien | |||
| Versailles | Green waste and animal powder | 2 | 0 |
| Poultry dropping | 2 | 0 | |
| Dried pig manure | 2 | 0 | |
| Compost of horse manure mixed with wood chip (farm 1) | 2 | 0 | |
| Compost of horse manure mixed with farm wheat straw (farm 2) | 2 | 62 (±10) | |
| Compost of horse manure mixed with commercial wheat straw (farm 3) | 2 | 164 (±18) | |
| Feucherolles | 1 month wet bovine manure (FYM) year 2006 | 3 | 15 (±2.2) |
| 1 month wet bovine manure (FYM) year 2007 | 3 | 5.4 (±1.4) | |
| Compost of municipal solid wastes (MSW) | 2 | 0 | |
| Compost of fermentable fraction of municipal wastes and green wastes (BW) | 2 | 0 | |
| Compost of sewage sludge, green wastes and wood chips (GWS) | 2 | 0 | |
| Rhone-Alpes | |||
| Versailleux | Poultry dropping (farm 1) | 3 | 0 |
| 6 months dry bovine manure (farm 1) | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 month wet bovine manure (farm 1) | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 month wet bovine manure (farm 2) | 3 | 19 (±3.8) | |
| Joyeux | Months dry bovine manure | 3 | 0 |
| Saint Olive | 1 month horse manure | 3 | 5.5 (±1.1) |
| Burgundy—RMQS library | |||
| Balot | Barley, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Venarey les laumes | Grassland, animal grazing, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Is sur Tille | Rapeseed, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
| Bourberain | Bourberain rapeseed, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Dompierre en Morvan | Grassland, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Ruffey les Echirey | Rapeseed, vegetal compost, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Marcilly Ogny | Triticale, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
| Commarin | Rapeseed, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Echevronne | Cereal, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Morey Saint Denis | Vineyard, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Saint Aubin | Vineyard, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Moulins-Engilbert | Grassland, animal grazing, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
| Cudot | Rapeseed, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Joigny | Wheat, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Brienon sur Armancon | Maize, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Treigny | Grassland, animal grazing, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Merry sur Yonne | Cereal, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Angely | Grassland, animal grazing | 2 | 0 |
| Saint Pere | Cereal, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Courcelles | Cereal, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Gilly sur Loire | Grassland, animal grazing, nd | 2 | 0 |
| Rigny sur Arroux | Grassland, animal grazing, no manure | 2 | 0 |
| Palinges | Grassland, animal grazing, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
| La Guiche | Grassland, animal grazing, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
| Salornay sur Guye | Fallow, nd | 2 | 0 |
| L'Hopital le Mercier | Grassland, animal grazing, pig slurry | 2 | 0 |
| Bassin parisien | |||
| Pierrelaye 1 | Maize | 10 | 0 |
| Pierrelaye 2 | Miscanthus, sewage sludge and waste water | 10 | 0 |
| Pierrelaye 3 | Maize, sewage sludge and waste water | 21 | 0 |
| Chavenay | Wheat, composted horse manure from Versailles farms | 3 | 0 |
| Fontenay le Fleury | Wheat, non-composted horse manure from Versailles farms | 3 | 0 |
| Unknown site 1 | Industrial site, hydrocarbon contamination | 2 | 1.1 (±0.13) |
| Unknown site 2 | Industrial site, hydrocarbon contamination | 2 | 34 (±7.0) |
| Unknown site 3 | Industrial site, hydrocarbon contamination | 2 | 0 |
| Limousin | |||
| St Iriex | Maize, farmyard manure | 1 | 0 |
| St Iriex | Grassland, animal grazing | 1 | 0 |
| Champnetery | Wheat, farmyard manure | 1 | 0 |
| Champnetery | Grassland, animal grazing | 1 | 0 |
| St Genest | Maize, farmyard manure | 1 | 0 |
| St Genest | Grassland, animal grazing | 1 | 0 |
| Sussac | Wheat, farmyard manure | 1 | 0 |
| Sussac | Grassland, animal grazing | 1 | 0 |
| Chaptelat | Forest | 1 | 0 |
| Lorraine | |||
| Neuves-Maisons | Industrial site, hydrocarbon contamination | 2 | 0.33 (±0.46) |
| Homecourt | Industrial site, hydrocarbon contamination | 2 | 0 |
| North | |||
| Courcelles-les-Lens 1 | Miscanthus, heavy metal contamination | 3 | 0 |
| Courcelles-les-Lens 2 | Wheat, heavy metal contamination | 3 | 0 |
| Dourges | Miscanthus | 3 | 0 |
| Rhone-Alpes | |||
| Versaileux | Maize, dry bovine manure from farm 2 | 3 | 0 |
| La Côte Saint-André | Maize | 1 | 0 |
| Montrond | Grassland | 1 | 0 |
| Burgundy—INRA site | |||
| Mâcon | Vineyard | 2 | 0 |
| Mâcon | Vineyard, mulching straw | 2 | 0 |
| Mâcon | Vineyard, conifer compost | 2 | 0 |
| Center—INRA site | |||
| Chinon | Vineyard | 2 | 0 |
| Chinon | Vineyard, mushroom manure | 2 | 0 |
| Chinon | Vineyard, vine shoot | 2 | 0 |
| Chinon | Vineyard, bovine manure | 2 | 0 |
No P. aeruginosa detection after enrichment
P. aeruginosa detection after enrichment.
Data previously reported in Colinon et al. (2013).
Culture-based detection of .
| Feucherolles—INRA site, 2006 | |||
| Before amendment | |||
| Control | 4 | 0 | − |
| BW | 4 | 0 | − |
| FYM | 4 | 0 | − |
| GWS | 4 | 0 | − |
| MSW | 4 | 0 | − |
| 1 month after amendment | |||
| Control | 4 | 0 | − |
| BW | 4 | 0 | − |
| FYM | 4 | 0 | − |
| GWS | 4 | 0 | − |
| MSW | 4 | 0 | − |
| 3 months after amendment | |||
| Control | 4 | 0 | − |
| BW | 4 | 0 | − |
| FYM | 4 | 0 | − |
| GWS | 4 | 0 | − |
| MSW | 4 | 0 | − |
| Tabtenga | |||
| 2007, control | 2 | 0 | − |
| 2007, UW | 2 | 0 | − |
| 2008, control | 3 | 0 | − |
| 2008, UW | 3 | 0 | − |
| 2011, control | 6 | 0 | − |
| 2011, UW | 12 | 0.01 | +(4/12) |
| Toudoubweogo | |||
| 2007, control | 2 | 0 | − |
| 2007, UW | 2 | 0 | − |
| 2008, control | 3 | 0 | − |
| 2008, UW | 3 | 0 | − |
| Zagtouli | |||
| 2008, control | 3 | 0 | − |
| 2008, UW | 3 | 0 | − |
| Yagma | |||
| 2007, control | 2 | 0 | − |
| 2007, UW | 2 | 0 | +(1/2) |
BW: compost of fermentable fractions of municipal wastes and green wastes; FYM: bovine farmyard manure; GWS: compost of sewage sludge, green wastes and wood chips; MSW: compost of municipal solid wastes in France, and untreated urban waste (UW) amendment in Burkina Faso.
−Negative isolation after acetamide enrichment.
+Positive isolation after acetamide enrichment.
Only 1 P. aeruginosa like-colony was detected on CAB plate spread with 1 ml of the undiluted soil suspension.