IMPORTANCE: Skin conditions are a common reason for patients to consult emergency department (ED) physicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-time teledermatologic expertise with the use of mobile telephones for the diagnosis and management of skin conditions in patients seen in the ED. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study of adults who consecutively consulted in the ED for a dermatologic condition was conducted under routine conditions in the ED from May 1, 2008, through June 30, 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnosis agreement and management concordance. RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-three patients (74.8%) were evaluated using videoconferencing. Dermatologic remote expertise invalidated, enlarged, or clarified ED physicians' diagnosis and management in 75 of 110 cases (68.2%). Videoconferencing improved the diagnostic performance in 57 of 83 cases (68.7%) (P < 10(-4)). Management concordance was moderate between ED physicians and dermatologists for specialist consultation within 24 hours (κ, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.14-0.84) and immediate hospitalization (κ, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.57). Patients were significantly more often discharged by dermatologists (46.8% vs 39.1%) (P < 10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with standard hardware, new-generation mobile devices reduce the cost of videoconferencing, increase the versatility of teledermatology, and decrease general practitioner investment time.
IMPORTANCE: Skin conditions are a common reason for patients to consult emergency department (ED) physicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-time teledermatologic expertise with the use of mobile telephones for the diagnosis and management of skin conditions in patients seen in the ED. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study of adults who consecutively consulted in the ED for a dermatologic condition was conducted under routine conditions in the ED from May 1, 2008, through June 30, 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnosis agreement and management concordance. RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-three patients (74.8%) were evaluated using videoconferencing. Dermatologic remote expertise invalidated, enlarged, or clarified ED physicians' diagnosis and management in 75 of 110 cases (68.2%). Videoconferencing improved the diagnostic performance in 57 of 83 cases (68.7%) (P < 10(-4)). Management concordance was moderate between ED physicians and dermatologists for specialist consultation within 24 hours (κ, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.14-0.84) and immediate hospitalization (κ, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.57). Patients were significantly more often discharged by dermatologists (46.8% vs 39.1%) (P < 10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with standard hardware, new-generation mobile devices reduce the cost of videoconferencing, increase the versatility of teledermatology, and decrease general practitioner investment time.
Authors: Morgan R Bobb; Paul G Van Heukelom; Brett A Faine; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Jeffrey T Messerly; Gregory Bell; Karisa K Harland; Christian Simon; Nicholas M Mohr Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 3.451