Literature DB >> 24807321

The case for universal prenatal genetic counseling.

Howard Minkoff1, Richard Berkowitz.   

Abstract

Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis screening, and new technologies including microarray analysis, cell-free fetal DNA, and carrier gene panels have become available. Obstetrics is at a crossroads, which requires consideration of new ways of providing genetic counseling. Currently a two-tiered process is used. Specific tests such as first- or second-trimester screening for aneuploidy are offered to virtually all women by a clinician who provides counseling and who may offer additional tests to patients in particular ethnic groups and those with unique obstetric or family histories. Frequently only this latter group and those who "screen positive" on the universally offered tests are sent to a genetic counselor. This approach worked well when screening focused on a relatively small number of diagnoses, but that is no longer the case. We argue that obstetricians, who were able to maintain mastery over the content of counseling when aneuploidies and karyotype analysis were the essential diagnoses and diagnostic tools available, are rarely able to offer the same level of expertise regarding the chromosomal, genomic, and genetic diseases now diagnosable and the newest available diagnostic methodologies. Therefore, all women, not just those surpassing some poorly defined level of risk, deserve genetic counseling. Approaches for achieving this goal are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807321     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options.

Authors:  Betsy L Gammon; Laura Otto; Myra Wick; Kristy Borowski; Megan Allyse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 4.  Supporting Patient Autonomy and Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Katie Stoll; Judith Jackson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

5.  Counseling and prenatal diagnosis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study on a 13-year multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Di Feo; Cinzia Bettio; Valentina Salsi; Emma Bertucci; Rossella Tupler
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Genetic Counselors' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Stacey Detweiler; Shivani B Nazareth; Elena Ashkinadze
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The case for stem cell counselors.

Authors:  Christopher Thomas Scott
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.765

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.