OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an evidence-based collaborative depression care intervention adapted to obstetrics and gynecology clinics compared with usual care. METHODS: A two-site, randomized controlled trial included screen-positive women (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of at least 10) who met criteria for major depression, dysthymia, or both (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview). Women were randomized to 12 months of collaborative depression management or usual care; 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month outcomes were compared. The primary outcomes were change from baseline to 12 months in depression symptoms and functional status. Secondary outcomes included at least 50% decrease and remission in depressive symptoms, global improvement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of care. RESULTS:Participants were, on average, 39 years old, 44% were nonwhite, and 56% had posttraumatic stress disorder. Intervention (n=102) compared with usual care (n=103) patients had greater improvement in depressive symptoms at 12 months (P<.001) and 18 months (P=.004). The intervention group compared with usual care group had improved functioning over the course of 18 months (P<.05), were more likely to have at least 50% decrease in depressive symptoms at 12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.73), greater likelihood of at least four specialty mental health visits (6-month RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.73-4.20; 12-month RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.63-3.94), adequate dose of antidepressant (6-month RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60; 12-month RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.08-2.73), and greater satisfaction with care (6-month RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.19-2.44; 12-month RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.52-3.36). CONCLUSION: Collaborative depression care adapted to women's health settings improved depressive and functional outcomes and quality of depression care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01096316. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an evidence-based collaborative depression care intervention adapted to obstetrics and gynecology clinics compared with usual care. METHODS: A two-site, randomized controlled trial included screen-positive women (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of at least 10) who met criteria for major depression, dysthymia, or both (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview). Women were randomized to 12 months of collaborative depression management or usual care; 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month outcomes were compared. The primary outcomes were change from baseline to 12 months in depression symptoms and functional status. Secondary outcomes included at least 50% decrease and remission in depressive symptoms, global improvement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of care. RESULTS:Participants were, on average, 39 years old, 44% were nonwhite, and 56% had posttraumatic stress disorder. Intervention (n=102) compared with usual care (n=103) patients had greater improvement in depressive symptoms at 12 months (P<.001) and 18 months (P=.004). The intervention group compared with usual care group had improved functioning over the course of 18 months (P<.05), were more likely to have at least 50% decrease in depressive symptoms at 12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.73), greater likelihood of at least four specialty mental health visits (6-month RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.73-4.20; 12-month RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.63-3.94), adequate dose of antidepressant (6-month RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60; 12-month RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.08-2.73), and greater satisfaction with care (6-month RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.19-2.44; 12-month RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.52-3.36). CONCLUSION:Collaborative depression care adapted to women's health settings improved depressive and functional outcomes and quality of depression care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01096316. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Wayne Katon; Joan Russo; Susan D Reed; Carmen A Croicu; Evette Ludman; Anna LaRocco; Jennifer L Melville Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Mary McCord; Ruth E K Stein; Bonnie D Kerker; Dara Weiss; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Allison J Carroll; Anna E Jaffe; Kimberley Stanton; Constance Guille; Gweneth B Lazenby; David E Soper; Amanda K Gilmore; Lauren Holland-Carter Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2020-06
Authors: Elizabeth A Howell; Norma A Padrón; Susan J Beane; Joanne Stone; Virginia Walther; Amy Balbierz; Rashi Kumar; José A Pagán Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2017-03
Authors: S Susan Hedayati; Divya M Daniel; Scott Cohen; Bryan Comstock; Daniel Cukor; Yaminette Diaz-Linhart; Laura M Dember; Amelia Dubovsky; Tom Greene; Nancy Grote; Patrick Heagerty; Wayne Katon; Paul L Kimmel; Nancy Kutner; Lori Linke; Davin Quinn; Tessa Rue; Madhukar H Trivedi; Mark Unruh; Steven Weisbord; Bessie A Young; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Bonnie Kerker; Ruth E K Stein; Dara Weiss; Emma D Whitmyre; Kimberly Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.681