Literature DB >> 24806939

Molecular mechanisms that regulate the coupled period of the mammalian circadian clock.

Jae Kyoung Kim1, Zachary P Kilpatrick2, Matthew R Bennett3, Krešimir Josić4.   

Abstract

In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24806939      PMCID: PMC4017850          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  64 in total

1.  Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling.

Authors:  Timothy J Lewis; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  On the phase reduction and response dynamics of neural oscillator populations.

Authors:  Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Post-translational modifications regulate the ticking of the circadian clock.

Authors:  Monica Gallego; David M Virshup
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  SO, a protein involved in hyphal fusion in Neurospora crassa, localizes to septal plugs.

Authors:  André Fleissner; N Louise Glass
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-11-10

5.  Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide requires parallel changes in adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C to entrain circadian rhythms to a predictable phase.

Authors:  Sungwon An; Robert P Irwin; Charles N Allen; Connie Tsai; Erik D Herzog
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Tsz-Leung To; Michael A Henson; Erik D Herzog; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators.

Authors:  Béla Novák; John J Tyson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks.

Authors:  Ute Abraham; Adrián E Granada; Pål O Westermark; Markus Heine; Achim Kramer; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Biochemical analysis of the canonical model for the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Rui Ye; Christopher P Selby; Nuri Ozturk; Yunus Annayev; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-α and REV-ERB-β.

Authors:  Han Cho; Xuan Zhao; Megumi Hatori; Ruth T Yu; Grant D Barish; Michael T Lam; Ling-Wa Chong; Luciano DiTacchio; Annette R Atkins; Christopher K Glass; Christopher Liddle; Johan Auwerx; Michael Downes; Satchidananda Panda; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  Amplitude metrics for cellular circadian bioluminescence reporters.

Authors:  Peter C St John; Stephanie R Taylor; John H Abel; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Multiscale modeling of tumor growth induced by circadian rhythm disruption in epithelial tissue.

Authors:  D A Bratsun; D V Merkuriev; A P Zakharov; L M Pismen
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  The validity of quasi-steady-state approximations in discrete stochastic simulations.

Authors:  Jae Kyoung Kim; Krešimir Josić; Matthew R Bennett
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  How to get oscillators in a multicellular clock to agree on the right period.

Authors:  Stephanie R Taylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Mathematical modeling and validation of glucose compensation of the neurospora circadian clock.

Authors:  Andrey A Dovzhenok; Mokryun Baek; Sookkyung Lim; Christian I Hong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Computational modeling of the cell-autonomous mammalian circadian oscillator.

Authors:  Olga A Podkolodnaya; Natalya N Tverdokhleb; Nikolay L Podkolodnyy
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2017-02-24

7.  Cycle dynamics and synchronization in a coupled network of peripheral circadian clocks.

Authors:  Odile Burckard; Michèle Teboul; Franck Delaunay; Madalena Chaves
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.661

8.  Stability of Wake-Sleep Cycles Requires Robust Degradation of the PERIOD Protein.

Authors:  Matthew D'Alessandro; Stephen Beesley; Jae Kyoung Kim; Zachary Jones; Rongmin Chen; Julie Wi; Kathleen Kyle; Daniel Vera; Michele Pagano; Richard Nowakowski; Choogon Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models.

Authors:  Jae Kyoung Kim
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.615

10.  Synchronizing stochastic circadian oscillators in single cells of Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Zhaojie Deng; Sam Arsenault; Cristian Caranica; James Griffith; Taotao Zhu; Ahmad Al-Omari; Heinz-Bernd Schüttler; Jonathan Arnold; Leidong Mao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.