| Literature DB >> 24805104 |
Hyunwook Kim1, Kyoung Hoon Kim2, Kisoo Park3, Shin-Wook Kang4, Tae-Hyun Yoo4, Song Vogue Ahn5, Hyeong Sik Ahn6, Hoo Jae Hann7, Shina Lee8, Jung-Hwa Ryu8, Seung-Jung Kim8, Duk-Hee Kang8, Kyu Bok Choi8, Dong-Ryeol Ryu8.
Abstract
To date, only a few large-scale studies have measured the effect of dialysis modality on mortality in Asian populations. Here, we sought to compare survival between incident hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. This enabled us to perform a population-based complete survey that included 32,280 incident dialysis patients and followed them for a median of 26.5 months. To reduce biases due to nonrandomization, we first matched 7049 patient pairs with similar propensity scores. Using the log-rank test, we found the mortality rate in PD patients was significantly higher than that in HD patients. Subsequent subgroup analyses indicated that in older patients (55 years and older), with the exception of the subgroup of patients with no comorbidities and the subgroup of patients with malignancy, PD was consistently associated with a higher mortality rate. In younger patients (under 55 years), regardless of the covariates, the survival rate of PD patients was comparable to that of HD patients. Thus, while the overall mortality rate was higher in incident PD patients, mortality rates of some incident PD and HD patients were comparable in Korea.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24805104 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612