Michael T Longaker1, Rod J Rohrich, Lauren Greenberg, Heather Furnas, Robert Wald, Vivek Bansal, Hisham Seify, Anthony Tran, Jane Weston, Joshua M Korman, Rodney Chan, David Kaufman, Vipul R Dev, Joseph A Mele, Michael Januszyk, Christy Cowley, Peggy McLaughlin, Bill Beasley, Geoffrey C Gurtner. 1. Stanford, Santa Rosa, Fullerton, Danville, Newport Beach, Atherton, Mountain View, Folsom, Bakersfield, Walnut Creek, and Menlo Park, Calif.; and Dallas, Arlington, and San Antonio, Texas From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine; Plastic Surgery Associates; The Aesthetic Institute; Elite MD, Inc.; Newport Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Associates; Atherton Plastic Surgery; Korman Plastic Surgery; Kaufman & Clark Plastic Surgery; VIP DEV MD; Walnut Creek Plastic Surgery; Neodyne Bioscience, Inc.; the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Arlington Plastic Surgery; and Clinical Division and Burn Center, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Scarring represents a significant biomedical burden in clinical medicine. Mechanomodulation has been linked to scarring through inflammation, but until now a systematic approach to attenuate mechanical force and reduce scarring has not been possible. METHODS: The authors conducted a 12-month, prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate abdominoplasty scar appearance following postoperative treatment with the embrace Advanced Scar Therapy device to reduce mechanical forces on healing surgical incisions. Incisions from 65 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive embrace treatment on one half of an abdominoplasty incision and control treatment (surgeon's optimal care methods) on the other half. The primary endpoint for this study was the difference between assessments of scar appearance for the treated and control sides using the visual analogue scale scar score. RESULTS: Final 12-month study photographs were obtained from 36 subjects who completed at least 5 weeks of dressing application. The mean visual analogue scale score for embrace-treated scars (2.90) was significantly improved compared with control-treated scars (3.29) at 12 months (difference, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.66; p = 0.027). Both subjects and investigators found that embrace-treated scars demonstrated significant improvements in overall appearance at 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale evaluation (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the embrace device significantly reduces scarring following abdominoplasty surgery. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the first level I evidence for postoperative scar reduction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Scarring represents a significant biomedical burden in clinical medicine. Mechanomodulation has been linked to scarring through inflammation, but until now a systematic approach to attenuate mechanical force and reduce scarring has not been possible. METHODS: The authors conducted a 12-month, prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate abdominoplasty scar appearance following postoperative treatment with the embrace Advanced Scar Therapy device to reduce mechanical forces on healing surgical incisions. Incisions from 65 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive embrace treatment on one half of an abdominoplasty incision and control treatment (surgeon's optimal care methods) on the other half. The primary endpoint for this study was the difference between assessments of scar appearance for the treated and control sides using the visual analogue scale scar score. RESULTS: Final 12-month study photographs were obtained from 36 subjects who completed at least 5 weeks of dressing application. The mean visual analogue scale score for embrace-treated scars (2.90) was significantly improved compared with control-treated scars (3.29) at 12 months (difference, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.66; p = 0.027). Both subjects and investigators found that embrace-treated scars demonstrated significant improvements in overall appearance at 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale evaluation (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the embrace device significantly reduces scarring following abdominoplasty surgery. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the first level I evidence for postoperative scar reduction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
Authors: Michael S Hu; Mimi R Borrelli; Wan Xing Hong; Samir Malhotra; Alexander T M Cheung; Ryan C Ransom; Robert C Rennert; Shane D Morrison; H Peter Lorenz; Michael T Longaker Journal: Organogenesis Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Leandra A Barnes; Clement D Marshall; Tripp Leavitt; Michael S Hu; Alessandra L Moore; Jennifer G Gonzalez; Michael T Longaker; Geoffrey C Gurtner Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Clement D Marshall; Michael S Hu; Tripp Leavitt; Leandra A Barnes; H Peter Lorenz; Michael T Longaker Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Zhong Zheng; Xinli Zhang; Catherine Dang; Steven Beanes; Grace X Chang; Yao Chen; Chen-Shuang Li; Kevin S Lee; Kang Ting; Chia Soo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Tripp Leavitt; Michael S Hu; Clement D Marshall; Leandra A Barnes; H Peter Lorenz; Michael T Longaker Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Shamik Mascharak; Heather E desJardins-Park; Michael F Davitt; Michelle Griffin; Mimi R Borrelli; Alessandra L Moore; Kellen Chen; Bryan Duoto; Malini Chinta; Deshka S Foster; Abra H Shen; Michael Januszyk; Sun Hyung Kwon; Gerlinde Wernig; Derrick C Wan; H Peter Lorenz; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Science Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 47.728