Literature DB >> 24804339

Hazardous substances in frequently used professional cleaning products.

Fabian Melchior Gerster, David Vernez, Pascal Pierre Wild, Nancy Brenna Hopf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing number of studies have identified cleaners as a group at risk for adverse health effects of the skin and the respiratory tract. Chemical substances present in cleaning products could be responsible for these effects. Currently, only limited information is available about irritant and health hazardous chemical substances found in cleaning products. We hypothesized that chemical substances present in cleaning products are known health hazardous substances that might be involved in adverse health effects of the skin and the respiratory tract.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of cleaning products used in the Swiss cleaning sector. We surveyed Swiss professional cleaning companies (n = 1476) to identify the most used products (n = 105) for inclusion. Safety data sheets (SDSs) were reviewed and hazardous substances present in cleaning products were tabulated with current European and global harmonized system hazard labels.
RESULTS: Professional cleaning products are mixtures of substances (arithmetic mean 3.5 +/- 2.8), and more than 132 different chemical substances were identified in 105 products. The main groups of chemicals were fragrances, glycol ethers, surfactants, solvents; and to a lesser extent, phosphates, salts, detergents, pH-stabilizers, acids, and bases. Up to 75% of products contained irritant (Xi), 64% harmful (Xn) and 28% corrosive (C) labeled substances. Hazards for eyes (59%) and skin (50%), and hazards by ingestion (60%) were the most reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning products potentially give rise to simultaneous exposures to different chemical substances. As professional cleaners represent a large workforce, and cleaning products are widely used, it is a major public health issue to better understand these exposures. The list of substances provided in this study contains important information for future occupational exposure assessment studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24804339      PMCID: PMC4096065          DOI: 10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 1077-3525


Introduction

Professional cleaning is a basic service occupation worldwide, and cleaning products are used daily in different environments, both indoors and outdoors.1,2 In recent years, a growing number of scientific studies have shown an association of cleaning work with respiratory adverse effects including asthma.3–5 In addition, skin diseases such as dermatitis of the hand have also been reported.6–8 One explanation for the observed respiratory adverse health effects among cleaning workers is chemical exposures deriving from cleaning products.2,9–11 Several studies have investigated the relationship between adverse health effects, cleaning activity, and cleaning products.12–19 Several risk factors were identified including exposure to chemical substances via application of cleaning products and other cleaning activities. Researchers have called for objective and more accurate estimates of occupational exposure to cleaning products in order to better understand their adverse effects.12 One major difficulty in this context is the multitude of cleaning products used, and the large number of chemical substances present in these products. Moreover, cleaning products are constantly changing because of ecological, economic, and consumer demands. Safety data sheets (SDSs) for professional cleaning products are made available to provide workers with health hazard information regarding substances or mixtures. The current EU classification system (Directives 1999/45/EC and 67/548/EEC) defines substances and preparations as dangerous if they are explosive (E), oxidizing (O), extremely or highly flammable (F+, F), very toxic (T+), toxic (T), harmful (Xn), corrosive (C), irritant (Xi), sensitizing (Xn or Xi), carcinogenic (T, Xn), mutagenic (T, Xn), toxic for reproduction (T, Xn), or dangerous for the environment (N). These labels are accompanied by risk phrases (R-phrases), and typical R-phrases used for cleaning products are listed in the Methods section. We identified frequently used professional cleaning products in Switzerland and through a systematic SDS analysis of these products, hazardous (C, Xn, Xi) substances were identified and listed. We plan to use these results in a future exposure study to better characterize exposures to substances presenting a health hazard among professional cleaning workers.

Methods

Selection of cleaning products

To select a representative group of frequently used cleaning products, we mailed a letter to cleaning companies located in the French- and German-speaking cantons of Switzerland (n = 1476, Fig. 1). The letter mailed to cleaning services was not available in Romansh and Italian languages, thereby excluding cleaning companies in the Romansh and Italian cantons of Switzerland. Cleaning companies were asked to specify cleaning activity, company size, and cleaning products used. Cleaning companies were identified from the Federal Office of Statistics using the code for cleaning companies (‘Nomenclature Générale des Activités économiques’ (NOGA code) (2008)). The NOGA data contained estimates about company size by number of employees. Companies were grouped into small (5–49 employees), medium (50–250 employees), and large (≧250 employees). Technical terms (both French and German) used in the cleaning sector were retrieved from the training manual used for professional cleaners in Switzerland.20 To process the large number of responses, we used the TeleForm software (Cardiff TeleForm, Version 10.5.2, San Diego, USA).
Figure 1

Flow-chart of the decision process for including and excluding (non-French- and non-German-speaking cantons, unknown addresses, or uncommon types of cleaning) cleaning companies in the study. 1 Number of cleaning services selected for the study. The table shows response rates by company size.

Flow-chart of the decision process for including and excluding (non-French- and non-German-speaking cantons, unknown addresses, or uncommon types of cleaning) cleaning companies in the study. 1 Number of cleaning services selected for the study. The table shows response rates by company size. The letter included a list of cleaning products (n = 488) from four major companies that manufactured, produced, and/or supplied products in Switzerland. This list of cleaning products by brand names was finalized after discussions with a professional cleaning association, a medium-sized cleaning company, and a training center for professional cleaners. The cleaning companies were asked to mark the cleaning products they used from the provided list, and in the case where the cleaning products they used were not listed, the company was asked to write down these names before mailing the responses back. An Excel spreadsheet was generated from TeleForm and imported to Stata (Stata 12, Stata Corp Lp, Lakeway Drive, USA). Response rates by company size were calculated. Cleaning products marked as being used by at least 10 cleaning companies were included in the systematic SDS analysis.

Safety data sheet analysis

Safety data sheets for cleaning products were obtained from the companies' web sites. If SDSs were not available, products were excluded from the SDS analysis. Selected products were grouped into 10 product categories: floor cleaners (FCs), general purpose cleaners (GPCs), polishing products (PPs), carpet cleaners (CCs), scale removing products (SRPs), bathroom cleaners (BCs), glass cleaners (GCs), disinfection products (DPs), kitchen cleaners (KCs), and other surfaces cleaners (OSCs). A comprehensive table was created listing all substances mentioned in the SDSs under section 3. Section 3 in the SDS lists all the ingredients in a mixture (chemical name, CAS number, and concentrations) that are classified as health hazards and are present above their cut-off/concentration limits. The frequency of a chemical substance's occurrence in selected products was recorded. Section 3 of SDSs is titled ‘Composition/information on ingredients’ and provides details about hazardous substances in the mixtures. Names, substance identifier (CAS number), concentration or concentration ranges, and classifications according to current danger letters and R-phrases (Directives 1999/45/EC and 67/548/EEC) as well as new hazard classes and statements (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008) are presented in the table.21–23 This was possible because Switzerland has from 1 December 2010 to 1 June 2017 to replace the current classification system (Directives 1999/45/EC and 67/548/EEC) with the new (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008), meeting the requirements of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS).24 Therefore, both the current classification and the new GHS labeling were available for this study. The regulations (Directive 67/548/EEC, Directive 1999/45/EC, EC No. 1272/2008) define substance concentration restrictions regarding the listing of substances in this section.21–23 Table 1 includes also the types(s) of cleaning products (FC, GPC, PP, CC, SRP, BC, GC, DP, KC, OSC) where the chemical substances were present. A literature search was performed in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/, 15 October 2013) by searching for ‘substance name’+‘exposure’ and ‘CAS number’+‘exposure’. If available, up to three studies were chosen for each chemical substance that was present in at least two selected cleaning products. Further criteria for the selection of references were ‘publishing date’, ‘health aspects’, ‘dermal and respiratory exposure studies’, ‘occupational exposure studies’, ‘exposure assessment methods’, ‘cleaning’, and ‘cleaning products’.
Table 1

List of substances identified in section 3 of safety data sheets (SDSs) for 105 selected cleaning products, listed in decreasing order of occurrence in products

SubstanceEU1GHS2Product3
NameCASL5R6C7S8%9N10Product typeReference4
Isopropyl alcohol67-63-0FR11Flam.Liq2H2251–7516FC, GPC, CC, BC, PP34–36
XiR20/21/22EyeIrrit.2H319
XnR36STOTSE3H336
R36/38
R67
Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether111-90-0XiR36SkinCorr.1BH3140.1–1015PP, GPC, FC37–39
EyeDam1H318
AcuteTox4H302
AquaticAcute1H400
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-tridecyl-omega-hydroxy-, branched69011-36-5XnR22EyeDam1H3181–2014FC, GPC, DP, CC, SRP, BCna
R41AcuteTox4H302
Dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether34590-94-8nananana1–2012PP, FC, GPC, CC, BC40–42
Citric acid77-92-9XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3191–309SRP, BC, FC43
Deceth-426183-52-8XiR22nana1–159SRP, KC, FC, BC, GPCna
XnR41
Ethanol64-17-5FR11Flam.Liq.2H2251–209GPC, PP, FC, BC, OSC44–46
Sulfonic acids, C13–17-sec-alkane, sodium salts85711-69-9XiR38R41EyeDam1H3181–158GPC, FCna
SkinIrrit.2H315
SkinCorr.1bH314
AcuteTox4H302
AquaticAcute1H400
Monoethanolamine141-43-5CR20SkinCorr.1bH3141–158FC, DP, GPC9, 47–49
XnR21STOTSE3H335
R22EyeDam1H318
R34AcuteTox4[H302 H312 H332]
R37
Benzenesulfonic acid, (1-methylethyl)-, sodium salt (1:1)28348-53-0XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3191–107FC, GPC, CC, BCna
Alcohols, C13–15-branched and linear, butoxylated ethoxylated111905-53-4XiR36/38SkinIrrit2H3151–306FC, GPC, CCna
EyeIrrit.2H319
Propane74-98-6F+R12Flam.Gas1H2201–306CC, GPC50
Press.GasH280
Alcohols, C12–14, ethoxylated68439-50-9XnR22EyeDam1H3181–105FC, GPC, SRPna
R41AcuteTox4H302
Benzyl alcohol100-51-6XnR20/22EyeIrrit.2H3191–205FC, GPC51–53
NR36AcuteTox4[H302, H332]
Butane106-97-8F+R12Flam.Gas1H22015–755CC54–56
Press.GasH280
Butoxypropanol5131-66-8XiR36/38SkinIrrit2H3151–30557
EyeIrrit.2H319
C12–15 Pareth-1168131-39-5XiR22EyeDam1H3180.1–155PP, FC, GPC58
XnR41AquaticAcute1H400
NR50AcuteTox4H302
Diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether112-34-5XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3195–305FC, SRP, PP59–61
Ethylene glycol107-21-1XnR22AcuteTox4H3021–205GPC, FC, PP62–64
Ethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether111-76-2XiR20SkinIrrit.2H3151–205GPC, FC, GC65–67
XnR21EyeIrrit.2H319
R22SkinSens.1[H302, H312, H332]
R36AcuteTox4
R38
PEG-10 tridecyl ether24938-91-8XiR41EyeDam1H3181–155FC, PP, GPCna
NR50
Phenoxyethanol122-99-6XiR22AcuteTox4H3021–105PP, FC, GPC68
XnR36EyeIrrit2H319
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-isodecyl-omega-hydroxy-61827-42-7XiR22nana1–155GPC, PP, OSCna
XnR41
Sulfamic acid5329-14-6XiR36/38SkinIrrit2H3153–155SRPna
R52/53EyeIrrit.2H319
AquaticChronic3H412
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-isodecyl-omega-hydroxy-107-98-2naR10Flam.Liq.3H2260.1–<104FC, CC, GPCna
Phosphoric acid7664-38-2CR34SkinCorr.1BH3145–304GPC, SRPna
Met.Corr.1H290
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-sulfo-omega-hydroxy-, C10–16-alkylethers, sodium salts68585-34-2XiR38EyeDam1H3181–154GC, BC, KC, GPCna
R41SkinIrrit.2H315
Sodium ethasulfate126-92-1XiR22EyeDam1H3181–54FC, BCna
XnR38SkinIrrit.2H315
R41
Tri(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate78-51-3nananana1–54PP69
AlkylalkoholalkoxylatnaXiR36SkinIrrit2H3151–104FC, GPCna
R38EyeIrrit.2H319
Alcohols, C10–12, ethoxylated propoxylated68154-97-2NR51AquaticChronic2H4111–53SRP, FCna
R53
Alpha-terpineol98-55-5XiR22SkinIrit.2H3150.01–153GPC, GC33, 70, 71
XnR41
R38
Ammonium hydroxide1336-21-6CR34SkinCorr.1BH3140.01–13PP, GPC72
NR50AquaticAcute1H400
Cyclohexanol, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-, 1-acetate32210-23-4NR51/53AquaticChronic2H4110.1–<53GPC, CCna
(d)-Limonene5989-27-5XiR10Flam.Liq3H2260.1–13GC, CC73–75
NR38AquaticAcute1H400
R43AquaticChronic1H410
R50/53SkinIrrit.2H315
SkinSens.1H317
Genapol X 0809043-30-5XiR22EyeDam1H3180.1–53PP, GPCna
XnR41AcuteTox4H302
R51
R53
Hydrocarbons, terpene processing by-products68956-56-9XnR51/53Asp.Tox.1H3040.01–13GC, GPCna
NR65AquaticChronic2H411
Fatty acids, coconut oil, potassium salts61789-30-8XiR36/38EyeIrrit2H3191–53GPC, FCna
SkinIrrit.2H316
Naphtha (petroleum), hydrotreated heavy64742-48-9XnR10nana3–>303GPC, FC76
R65
R66
Silicic acid, disodium salt, pentahydrate10213-79-3CR34SkinCorr1BH3141–153KC, FCna
XiR37STOTSE3H335
Sodium hydroxide1310-73-2CR35SkinCorr.1AH3140.01–103FC, GC, KC77
AlkylalkoholethoxylatnaXiR22nana<5–152FC, GPCna
XnR41
1-Propoxy-2-propanol1569-01-3naR10Flam.Liq3H2261–502GC, GPC78
EyeIrrit2H319
Nerol106-25-2FR12SkinIrrit2H3150.01–102GC, GPC79–81
XiR38Flam.Gas1H220
Press.GasH280
2-t-Butylcyclohexyl acetate88-41-5NR51, R53AquaticChronic2H4110.1–12CC, BCna
Alanine, N,N-bis(carboxymethyl)-, sodium salt (1:3)164462-16-2nananana1–<52CC, FCna
Alkanes, C9–12-iso-90622-57-4XnR10nana30–752CC, FC82
R53
R65
R66
Coconut acid61788-47-4XiR36/38SkinCorr.1BH314na2GPC, FC83
EyeDam1H318
AcuteTox4H302
AquaticAcute1H400
Decyl d-glucoside54549-25-6XiR36nana1–52KC, SRPna
Diphosphoric acid, tetrapotassium salt7320-34-5XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3141–32GPC, FCna
Heptane142-82-5FR11Flam.Liq.2H2255–202CC84, 85
XnR38Asp.Tox.1H304
NR50/53AquaticAcute1H400
R65AquaticChronic1H410
R67SkinIrrit.2H315
STOTSE3H336
Isobutane75-28-5F+R12Flam.Gas1H2203–202CC86
Press.GasH281
Linalool78-70-6XiR38, R43SkinIrrit2, SkinSens.1H315, H3170.01–32GC, CC87, 88
Non-ionic tensidesnaXiR22nana5–302FCna
XnR38
NR50
Oxirane, methyl, polymer and oxibane, butyl ether9038-95-3XnR22AcuteTox4H3023–102FCna
Polymer dispersionnananananana2PPna
Quaternary ammonium compounds, benzyl-C12–16-alkyldimethyl, chlorides68424-85-1CR21/22SkinCorr.1BH3143–102GPCna
NR34AquaticAcute1H400
PEG-15 cocoate61791-29-5XiR36nana1–52FC, GPCna
Sodium chloride7647-14-5CR34SkinCorr.1BH3140.01–102GC, SRP
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12–16-alkyl esters, sodium salts73296-89-6XiR38nana5–152CCna
R37Met.Corr.1H290
STOTSE3H335
(l)-(−)-Ethyl lactate687-47-8XiR10EyeDam1H3183–101CC
R37Flam.Liq.3H226
R41STOTSE3H335
1,4-Dioxacycloheptadecane-5,17-dione105-95-3NR10nana<51GPC
R51
R53
1-Penten-3-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-7779-30-8NR51/53AquaticChronic2H4110.1–11CC
2-Diethylaminoethanol100-37-8CR10SkinCorr.1BH3141–31GPC
R20/21/22Flam.Liq.3H226
R34AcuteTox4[H302, H312, H332]
2-Trans-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol106-24-1naR38EyeDam1H3180.01–0.11GC
R41SkinSens.1H317
R43SkinIrrit.2H315
3,7-Dimethyl-6-octen-1-ol106-22-9XiR38SkinIrrit2H315<0.011GC
NR43SkinSens1H317
R51/53AquaticChronic2H411
6-Octenenitrile, 3,7-dimethyl-51566-62-2naR52/53AquaticChronic3H4120.01–0.11GC
Acetyl cedrene32388-55-9NR50/53AquaticAcute1H4000.1–11CC
AquaticChronic1H410
Alcohols, C12–18, ethers with polyethylene glycol mono-Bu ether146340-16-1NR50SkinIrrit2H3151–51FC
XiR38AquaticAcute1H400
Acid blue 33536-49-0nananana<0.011GC
Alcohols, C10–16, ethoxylated propoxylated69227-22-1XiR22nana5–151FC
XnR41
Alcohols, C16–18 and C18–unsatd., ethoxylated68920-66-1XnR22EyeDam1H3181–31PP
NR38AquaticAcute1H400
R41AcuteTox4H302
R50SkinIrrit.2H315
AlkyletherphosphatesodiumsaltnaXiR36nana1–51SRP
R38
Alpha-d-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl125590-73-0XiR41EyeDam1H3183–101BC
Alpha-isomethylionone127-51-5XiR43SkinSens1H3170.1–11CC
R52/53AquaticChronic3H412
Alpha-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)benzenepropanal103-95-7XnR38Repr.2H3610.1–11CC
NR43SkinIrrit.2H315
R51/53SkinSens.1H317
R62AquaticChronic2H411
Amides, coconut oil, N-(2-((sulfosuccinyl)oxy)ethyl), sodium salts68784-08-7XiR41nanana1CC
Amyl salicylate2050-08-0NR51/53nana<51GPC
Anethole, trans4180-23-8NR51/53nana<51GPC
Aromatic naphtha, type I64742-95-6XiR10nana0.1–11FC
XnR37
NR53
R65
R66
R67
R51
Benzaldehyde100-52-7XnR22nanana1GPC
Benzenesulfonic acid, 4-C10–13-sec-alkyl derivs.85536-14-7CR22SkinCorr.1CH3143–101SRP
R34AcuteTox4H302
Benzenesulfonic acid, mono-C10–13-alkyl derivs., compds. With ethanolamine85480-55-3XnR22EyeDam1H3183–101FC
R38AcuteTox4H302
R41SkinIrrit.2H315
Benzenesulfonic acid, mono-C10–13-alkyl derivs., sodium salts90194-45-9XnR22EyeDam1H3183–101GPC
R38AcuteTox4H302
R41SkinIrrit.2H315
Benzyl acetate140-11-4XiR36/37/38SkinIrrit.2H315oct.201CC
EyeIrrit.2H319
STOTSE3H335
Benzyl benzoate120-51-4XnR22AcuteTox4H3021–31CC
NR51/53AquaticChronic2H411
Benzyl salicylate118-58-1XiR43SkinSens1H3170.1–11CC
NR51/53AquaticChronic2H411
Beta-pinene127-91-3XnR65SkinCorr.1BH314na1PGPC
NR50EyeDam1H318
R53AcuteTox4H302
AquaticAcute1H400
Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1-ester with N-(2-hydroxyethyl)dodecanamide, disodium salt25882-44-4XiR36/38SkinIrrit2H3153–101CC
EyeIrrit.2H319
C11–15 Pareth-2068131-40-8XiR22nana1–51GPC
XnR41
Camphene79-92-5FR11SkinCorr.1BH314na1FC
XiR36EyeDam1H318
NR50AcuteTox4H302
R53AquaticAcute1H400
Citral5392-40-5XiR38SkinIrrit2H3150.01–0.11GC
R43SkinSens.1H317
Coumarin91-64-5XnR22AcuteTox3H3010.1–11CC
R43SkinSens.1H317
d-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, decyl octyl glycosides68515-73-1XiR41nana1–51BC
Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether111-77-3naR63nanana1PP
Dimethyl ether115-10-6F+R12nana50–751CC
Disodium phosphate7558-79-4nananana0.1–11CC
Ethylene glycol monomontanate73138-45-1nananana3–101PP
Eugenol97-53-0XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3190.1–11CC
R43SkinSens.1H317
Fatty acids, coco, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethyl esters91031-83-3XiR36nana1–51FC
Fatty acid amidesnaXiR38nana<51GPC
R41
Galaxolide1222-05-5NR50/53AquaticAcute1H4000.1–11CC
AquaticChronic1H410
Hydroxyacetic acid79-14-1CR34nana1–51SRP
Isoeugenol97-54-1XnR21/22SkinIrrit.2H3150.1–11CC
R36/38EyeIrrit.2H319
R43SkinSens.1H317
AcuteTox4[H302, H312]
Laurylamine dipropylenediamine2372-82-9CR22AcuteTox.3H3010.1–11DP
NR35SkinCorr.1AH314
R48/22STOTRE2H373
R50AquaticAcute1H400
Lilial80-54-6XiR22Repr.2H361<0.011GC
XnR38Acute Tox4H302
NR43SkinIrrit.2H315
R62SkinSens.1H317
R51/53AquaticChronic2H411
Lyral31906-04-4XiR43SkinSens1H3170.1–11CC
R52/53AquaticChronic3H412
Methanesulfonic acid75-75-2CR34SkinCorr.1BH3143–101BC
Mineral oil8012-95-1XnR655–151FC
Naphtha (petroleum), heavy alkylate64741-65-7XnR10AcuteTox.3H331>751PP
R53Asp.Tox.1H304
R65Flam.Liq.3H226
R66AquaticChronic4[H413, EUH006]
NatriumlaurylethoxylsulfatenaXiR38nana<51GPC
R41
n-Octyl-polyoxyethylene27252-75-1XiR41nana1–51FC
Pentapotassium triphosphate13845-36-8XiR36/38nana5–151GPC
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl-2785-87-7XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3190.1–11CC
R43SkinSens.1H317
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-sulfo-omega-hydroxy-, C12–14-alkyl ethers, sodium salts68891-38-5XiR38EyeDam1H318<101FC
R41SinIrrit.2H315
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(2-propylheptyl)-omega-hydroxy-160875-66-1XiR41EyeDam1H31803–101FC
Polyoxyl 20 cetostearyl ether68439-49-6NR41nana0.1–11PP
R50
Potassium hydroxide1310-58-3CR22nana1–51FC
XnR35
Silicon dioxide7631-86-9nananana0.1–11CC
Sodium 2-butoxyethyl sulfate67656-24-0XiR36/38nana1–51FC
Sodium benzoate532-32-1nananana0.1–11CC
Sodium carbonate497-19-8XiR36EyeIrrit.2H3191–31DP
Sodium sulfate7757-82-6nananana0.01–0.11GC
Solvent naphtha (petroleum), heavy arom.64742-94-5XnR51/53Asp.Tox.1H3040.1–11PP
NR65STOTSE3H336
R66AquaticChronic2[H411, EUH006]
Solvent naphtha (petroleum), medium aliph.64742-88-7XnR10nana25–501OSC
R56
Sulfuric acid, mono-C10–16-alkyl esters, sodium salts68585-47-7XiR38EyeDam1H3183–101CC
R41SkinIrrit.2H315
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12–14-alkyl esters, sodium salts85586-07-8XiR38nanana1CC
R41
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12–16-alkyl esters, sodium salts73296-89-6XiR38nana5–152CC
R41
Sodium C14–16 olefin sulfonate68439-57-6XiR38SkinIrrit.2H3151–51CC
R41EyeDam1H318
Terpinolene586-62-9XnR10nana<51GPC
NR51/53
R65
Triethanolamine102-71-6XiR36/38nana1–51GPC
Waxmixturenananananana1PP

NA: not available; FC: floor cleaner; GPC: general purpose cleaner; PP: polishing product; CC: carpet cleaner; SRP: scale removing product; BC: bathroom cleaner; GC: glass cleaner; DP: disinfection product; KC: kitchen cleaner; OSC: other surfaces cleaner.

1 Directives 1999/45/EC and 67/548/EEC.

2 Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

3 Information about amount and frequency in selection of professional cleaning product.

4 Studies about substances listed in Table 1, when substances where present in at least two cleaning products.

5 Danger letter.

6 Risk-phrase.

7 Hazard class.

8 Hazard statement.

9 Amount of substance in selected professional cleaning products.

10 Number of selected professional cleaning products that contain the listed chemical substance.

NA: not available; FC: floor cleaner; GPC: general purpose cleaner; PP: polishing product; CC: carpet cleaner; SRP: scale removing product; BC: bathroom cleaner; GC: glass cleaner; DP: disinfection product; KC: kitchen cleaner; OSC: other surfaces cleaner. 1 Directives 1999/45/EC and 67/548/EEC. 2 Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. 3 Information about amount and frequency in selection of professional cleaning product. 4 Studies about substances listed in Table 1, when substances where present in at least two cleaning products. 5 Danger letter. 6 Risk-phrase. 7 Hazard class. 8 Hazard statement. 9 Amount of substance in selected professional cleaning products. 10 Number of selected professional cleaning products that contain the listed chemical substance. Fragrances sometimes do not meet the criteria to be listed in section 3 ‘Composition/information on ingredients’ of the SDSs (e.g. low concentration). However fragrances, preservatives, and others are mentioned in section 15 ‘Regulatory Information’ if they are subjected to other regulations such as substances depleting the ozone layer ((EC) No. 2037/2000, persistent organic pollutants (EC) No. 850/2004, and export/import of dangerous substances (EC) No. 689/2008).25–27 Names of fragrances, preservatives, and other chemical substances listed under section 15 of SDSs are reported in the Results section. Cleaning products containing at least one substance listed with corrosive, irritant, and harmful symbols under the current EU classification system were counted and expressed in percentage for each of the 10 product categories. Similar results were presented for the R-phrases. R-phrases relevant in this study are harmful by inhalation (R20), are harmful in contact with skin (R21), are harmful if swallowed (R22), causes burns (R34), causes severe burns (R35), is irritating to eyes (R36), is irritating to respiratory system (R37), is irritating to skin (R38), has risk of serious damage to eyes (R41), may cause sensitization by skin contact (R43), has danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure (R48), has possible risk of impaired fertility (R62), has possible risk of harm to the unborn child (R63), is harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed (R65), repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking (R66), and vapors may cause drowsiness and dizziness (R67).The fractions of cleaning products, with at least one substance listed with the R-phrases R20, R21, R22, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R41, R43, R48, R62, R63, R65, R66, and R67, were expressed in percentage.

Results

The response rate to the letter sent to cleaning companies was the highest (50%) for large companies (≧250 employees), and lower for medium (24%) and small (11%) companies (Fig. 1). Based on company responses, respondent companies employed >40 000 employees. A total of 116 products were selected for SDS analysis and 11 products were excluded because of missing SDSs. In the 105 remaining selected products, 132 different chemical substances were listed in the SDSs reviewed. In average, one cleaning product contained 3.5 (±2.8) chemical substances listed in section 3 of the SDSs. The composition of the cleaning products varied depending on their intended use. The substances we identified are listed in Table 1. Although the type of glycol ethers varied greatly across cleaning products, they were often (20% of the products) present in both small and large amounts (0.1–50% in the products). Most glycol ethers were found in PPs (48%), SRPs (42%), GPCs (37%), and FCs (36%); some (20%) were found in DPs and KCs, and few (10–11%) were found in GCs, BCs, and CCs. The choice of surfactants was diverse but were present in 19% of the products and their concentration ranges varied greatly (0.1–30% in the products). We particularly focused on ethanolamines, known for their sensitizing properties.28 Three ethanolamines were identified: monoethanolamine, triethanolamine, and 2-diethylaminoethanol. The most frequently used was monoethanolamine, which was present in eight products (n = 8): five FCs, two GPCs, and one KC. In all, 16% of the products contained organic solvents and the concentration ranges varied enormously (0.1–75%) making up 75% of one of the products (PP). Other typical ingredients, although in lower concentrations, accounted for 18% of our substance list (Table 1): phosphates, salts, detergents, pH-stabilizers, acids, and bases. Quaternary ammonium compounds or ‘quats’, a substance class known for sensitizing and allergic responses among cleaners, were found in two products in 3–10% concentrations.2,29 Fragrances were commonly (27% of identified substances) found in low concentrations (0.01–5%), except when they also acted as a solvent (30%). Interestingly, up to 91% of the selected cleaning products contained at least one substance that was subject to other regulations and are listed under section 15 of SDSs. In total, 26 substances were found under section 15 of the SDS (Table 2).
Table 2

Fraction of selected cleaning products (%) that contain the listed chemical substance

Substance nameP (%)
Linalool20
Butylphenyl methylpropional16
Benzisothiazolinone16
Hexyl cinnamal15
Limonene14
Methylisothiazolione12
Aliphatic carbohydrates9–10
Amyl cinnamal9–10
Benzyl salicylate9–10
Citronellol9–10
Formaldehyde deposit alpha mixture with 5-chloro-2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one 2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one9–10
Hydroxycitronellol9–10
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxyaldehyde9–10
Isoeugenol9–10
Sodium hydroxymethylglycinate9–10
Alpha-isomethyl ionone<7
Benzyl alcohol<7
Benzyl benzoate<7
Cinnamal, citral<7
Coumarin<7
Eugenol<7
Geraniol<7
Glutaral<7
Octylisothiazolinone<7
Phenoxyethanol<7
In all, 11 substances listed in section 3 of SDSs were neither classified with danger symbol letters and R-phrases nor with hazard classes and categories. The remaining 117 substances were classified with danger symbol letters and R-phrases as well as with hazard classes and categories. Of these, 82 substances were listed in addition to hazard classifications and statements (GHS). In all, 4 substances were listed in SDSs of more than 10 products, 17 substances in SDSs of 5–10 products, 38 in SDSs of 2–4 products, and 69 were mentioned only once in the SDSs of the 105 selected cleaning products. By product categories, usually less than 40% of cleaning products were labeled corrosive (C) in section 3 of SDSs, with exception SRPs (78%, Fig. 2). In most product categories, more than 70% of the products were labeled irritant (Xi), except for PPs (33%). More than 50% of the products were labeled harmful (Xn), except for product category CCs (31%).
Figure 2

Percentages of products by product categories containing at least one substance labeled as corrosive (C), irritant (Xi), and harmful (Xn) in section 3 of SDSs. Floor cleaner (FC), general purpose cleaner (GPC), polishing product (PP), carpet cleaner (CC), scale removing product (SRP), bathroom cleaner (BC), glass cleaner (GC), disinfection product (DP), kitchen cleaner (KC), and other surfaces cleaner (OSC).

Percentages of products by product categories containing at least one substance labeled as corrosive (C), irritant (Xi), and harmful (Xn) in section 3 of SDSs. Floor cleaner (FC), general purpose cleaner (GPC), polishing product (PP), carpet cleaner (CC), scale removing product (SRP), bathroom cleaner (BC), glass cleaner (GC), disinfection product (DP), kitchen cleaner (KC), and other surfaces cleaner (OSC). A total of 15 R-phrases regarding human health were identified (Fig. 3): corrosive (R34, R35), irritant (R36, R37, R38), harmful (R20, R21, R22), sensitizing (R43), and others (R41, R62, R63, R65, R66, R67). Figure 3 shows the percentages of products (all categories) that have been labeled with these R-phrases in section 3 of SDSs.
Figure 3

Percentages of cleaning products that have been labeled with corrosive (R34, R35), irritant (R36, R37, R38), harmful (R20, R21, R22), sensitizing (R43), and other (R41, R62, R63, R65, R66, R67) R-phrases in section 3 of safety data sheets (SDSs).

Percentages of cleaning products that have been labeled with corrosive (R34, R35), irritant (R36, R37, R38), harmful (R20, R21, R22), sensitizing (R43), and other (R41, R62, R63, R65, R66, R67) R-phrases in section 3 of safety data sheets (SDSs).

Discussion

Frequently used professional cleaning products contain a multitude of chemical substances with known health effects. Cleaners may therefore be exposed to mixtures of health hazardous substances during their cleaning activity. It is important to note that SDSs do not list all chemical substances present in a product, as regulations define substances and concentrations that must be listed.21,23 Depending on the characteristics of the substances (e.g. persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity), the concentration levels requiring listing are 1 or 0.1%.30 Sensitizers were listed as a cleaning product ingredient under section 15 in the SDSs only if required by other regulations.25–27 Interestingly, several substances found under section 15 of SDSs have been associated with sensitizing mechanisms and/or allergic reactions. In our study, we selected frequently used cleaning products known from cleaning companies with five or more employees. The cleaning products included the four most popular brands that, according to a professional association for cleaning companies in Switzerland, account for >50% of the Swiss professional cleaning products market. As mentioned above, we estimated that our results include products used by about 50% of the Swiss cleaning workforce. This is because the large cleaning companies reported to have high numbers of employees (more than several thousand). Most cleaning products identified in this study were sold by global companies that sell and distribute their products worldwide. The results of this study may hold true for other industrialized countries similar to Switzerland, although the cleaning product might be given a different brand name. Not only is there a great diversity of chemical substances within cleaning products but also numerous companies offer hundreds of different cleaning products, which makes the task of assessing chemical substances used in professional cleaning products complicated. Indeed, responses showed cleaning companies using products from 36 different product companies, and some reported that they produced their own products. Thus when investigating exposures among professional cleaners, a SDS review is a requirement. We believe our results provide important information regarding type of cleaning products used in this industry, and common chemical substance classes found in these products and their health hazards. This knowledge should help in monitoring professional cleaners and their exposures to cleaning products and substances with known health effects. In addition, not only cleaning workers or those who are cleaning are at risk of exposure but also persons in rooms that were recently cleaned can potentially be exposed.31–33 The main challenges in conducting an occupational exposure assessment for professional cleaners are the great number of cleaning products available and the large number of substances in these products. For further investigation, we recommend to focus on the 21 substances found in ≧5 products (Table 1). Especially of interest are the recognized sensitizers monoethanolamine and glycol ethers, frequently found in cleaning products. Substances found in professional cleaning products may likely also be ingredients in cleaning products sold to the general public; however, we did not survey these products.28

Conclusion

This work contributes to the efforts to better understand possible exposures to chemicals during the use of professional cleaning products. We found that hazardous substances in cleaning products are in particular fragrances, glycol ethers, surfactants, solvents, and to a lesser extent phosphates, salts, detergents, pH-stabilizers, acids, and bases. Cleaning workers who are handling these products are therefore a group at risk for several occupational exposures. Section 15 in the SDS should be consulted, as several substances involved in sensitizing mechanisms and/or allergic reactions were also listed here. Especially glycol ethers and ethanolamines are frequently used in cleaning products, and could therefore be involved in the development of adverse health effects like irritant or sensitizer-induced asthma, which has been found to be elevated among professional cleaners. Concerning asthma, the presence of different aldehydes as fragrances is also of special interest. Besides some sensitizers like ethanolamines, mainly irritants were found, suggesting that pathologies of the skin and the respiratory tract may also occur without mechanisms of sensitization. A simultaneous exposure to several hazardous chemical substances could potentially be involved in these pathologies. As professional cleaners represent a large workforce, and cleaning products are widely used, including in private cleaning, it is of great environmental and public health importance to better understand the exposures that may be caused by the use of cleaning products. Our list of substances provides important information about which chemicals and hazards are relevant for further investigations in this field, and we plan to use these results for field exposure studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
  78 in total

1.  Possible health effects of liquefied petroleum gas on workers at filling and distribution stations of Gaza governorates.

Authors:  M M Sirdah; N A Al Laham; R A El Madhoun
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.628

2.  Chronic ammonium hydroxide exposure.

Authors:  M H Kollef
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  α-Pinene, 3-carene and d-limonene in indoor air of Polish apartments: the impact on air quality and human exposure.

Authors:  Sylwia Król; Jacek Namieśnik; Bożena Zabiegała
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  The fate of dermally applied [14C]d-limonene in rats and humans.

Authors:  Anne Marie Api; Gretchen Ritacco; David R Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.032

5.  Identification of volatile metabolites of inhaled n-heptane in rat urine.

Authors:  J Bahima; A Cert; M Menéndez-Gallego
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  An analysis of workplace exposures to benzene over four decades at a petrochemical processing and manufacturing facility (1962-1999).

Authors:  J Sahmel; K Devlin; A Burns; T Ferracini; M Ground; D Paustenbach
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2013

7.  A subchronic dermal exposure study of diethylene glycol monomethyl ether and ethylene glycol monomethyl ether in the male guinea pig.

Authors:  D W Hobson; A P D'Addario; R H Bruner; D E Uddin
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1986-02

Review 8.  Safety evaluation and risk assessment of d-Limonene.

Authors:  Young Woo Kim; Min Ji Kim; Bu Young Chung; Du Yeon Bang; Seong Kwang Lim; Seul Min Choi; Duck Soo Lim; Myung Chan Cho; Kyungsil Yoon; Hyung Sik Kim; Kyu Bong Kim; You Sun Kim; Seung Jun Kwack; Byung-Mu Lee
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

9.  The acute toxicity and primary irritancy of 1-propoxy-2-propanol.

Authors:  B Ballantyne; R C Myers; P E Losco
Journal:  Vet Hum Toxicol       Date:  1988-04

10.  Occupational skin disease in hospital cleaning and kitchen workers.

Authors:  D J Gawkrodger; M H Lloyd; J A Hunter
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  9 in total

1.  Health risks in the cleaning industry: a Belgian census-linked mortality study (1991-2011).

Authors:  Laura Van den Borre; Patrick Deboosere
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Peaks, Means, and Determinants of Real-Time TVOC Exposures Associated with Cleaning and Disinfecting Tasks in Healthcare Settings.

Authors:  M Abbas Virji; Xiaoming Liang; Feng-Chiao Su; Ryan F LeBouf; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Marcia L Stanton; Paul K Henneberger; E Andres Houseman
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Characterization of Exposure to Cleaning Agents Among Health Workers in Two Southern African Tertiary Hospitals.

Authors:  H H Mwanga; R Baatjies; M F Jeebhay
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  Environmental Health Needs Among Latinas in Cleaning Occupations: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Erin Speiser; Genevieve Pinto Zipp; Deborah A DeLuca; Ana Paula Cupertino; Evelyn Arana-Chicas; Elli Gourna Paleoudis; Traci N Bethea; Benjamin Kligler; Francisco Cartujano-Barrera
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-05-19

Review 5.  From one species to another: A review on the interaction between chemistry and microbiology in relation to cleaning in the built environment.

Authors:  Samantha Velazquez; Willem Griffiths; Leslie Dietz; Patrick Horve; Susie Nunez; Jinglin Hu; Jiaxian Shen; Mark Fretz; Chenyang Bi; Ying Xu; Kevin G Van Den Wymelenberg; Erica M Hartmann; Suzanne L Ishaq
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Cleaning Products Commonly Used in Oklahoma Family Child Care Homes: Implications for Respiratory Risk and Children's Health.

Authors:  Cassandra D Querdibitty; Marianna S Wetherill; Susan B Sisson; Bethany Williams; Kan Aithinne; Haeyn Seo; Nancy R Inhofe; Janis Campbell; Megan Slawinski; Alicia L Salvatore
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  An Overview of Cleaning Agents' Health Hazards and Occupational Injuries and Diseases Attributed to Them in Sweden.

Authors:  Maitreyi Kathare; Anneli Julander; Behnaz Erfani; Linda Schenk
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.779

8.  The use of cleaning products and its relationship with the increasing health risks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sumbule Koksoy Vayisoglu; Emine Oncu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.149

9.  Knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of Latinas in cleaning occupations in northern New Jersey: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.

Authors:  Erin Speiser; Genevieve Pinto Zipp; Deborah A DeLuca; Ana Paula Cupertino; Evelyn Arana-Chicas; Elli Gourna Paleoudis; Benjamin Kligler; Francisco Cartujano-Barrera
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.646

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.