| Literature DB >> 24804246 |
Takeshi Ikeda1, Kahori Ikeda1, Kouhei Yamamoto1, Hidetaka Ishizaki1, Yuu Yoshizawa1, Kajiro Yanagiguchi1, Shizuka Yamada1, Yoshihiko Hayashi1.
Abstract
Cells, growth factors, and scaffolds are the three main factors required to create a tissue-engineered construct. After the appearance of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), considerable attention has therefore been focused on nonbovine materials. In this study, we examined the properties of a chitosan porous scaffold. A porous chitosan sponge was prepared by the controlled freezing and lyophilization of different concentrations of chitosan solutions. The materials were examined by scanning electron microscopy, and the porosity, tensile strength, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) release profiles from chitosan sponge were examined in vitro. The morphology of the chitosan scaffolds presented a typical microporous structure, with the pore size ranging from 50 to 200 μm. The porosity of chitosan scaffolds with different concentrations was approximately 75-85%. A decreasing tendency for porosity was observed as the concentration of the chitosan increased. The relationship between the tensile properties and chitosan concentration indicated that the ultimate tensile strength for the sponge increased with a higher concentration. The in vitro bFGF release study showed that the higher the concentration of chitosan solution became, the longer the releasing time of the bFGF from the chitosan sponge was.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24804246 PMCID: PMC3997083 DOI: 10.1155/2014/786892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Cross-sectional SEM images of chitosan scaffolds (CS) made with different concentrations. (×100) (a): 1 wt% CS; (b): 2 wt% CS; (c): 4 wt% CS; (d): MedGel (containing gelatin, used as a control).
Figure 3Comparison of the mean pore size of each sponge. The data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 5). # P < 0.01 compared with 4 wt% chitosan solution (CS).
Figure 2Cross-sectional SEM images of chitosan scaffolds (CS) made with different concentrations after incubation in a PBS solution at 37°C for 4 weeks (×100). (a): 1 wt% CS; (b): 2 wt% CS; (c): 4 wt% CS; (d): MedGel (containing gelatin, used as a control).
Figure 4Comparison of the porosity of each sponge type. The data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 5).
The mechanical properties of sponges with different concentrations of chitosan in the wet state (average ± standard deviation of at least five samples).
| Type of sponge | Tensile strength (Mpa) | Young's modulus (Mpa) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 wt% | 0.07 ± 0.01Ab | 0.05 ± 0.02Bb |
| 2 wt% | 0.12 ± 0.03Ac | 0.23 ± 0.06Bc |
| 4 wt% | 0.44 ± 0.08Ad | 2.02 ± 0.11Bd |
| Gelatin | 0.03 ± 0.01Aa | 0.02 ± 0.02Ba |
Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 5The bFGF release profiles from the chitosan sponges with different concentrations and from the gelatin scaffold.