Literature DB >> 24804157

Visual Feedback of Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping to Optimize Effective Patient Repositioning.

Ronald G Scott1, Kristen M Thurman2.   

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new bedside pressure mapping technology for patient repositioning in a long-term acute care hospital. Approach: Bedside caregivers repositioned patients to the best of their abilities, using pillows and positioning aids without the visual feedback from a continuous bedside pressure mapping (CBPM) system. Once positioned, caregivers were shown the image from the CBPM system and allowed to make further adjustments to the patient position. Data from the CBPM device, in the form of visual screenshots and peak pressure values, were obtained after each repositioning phase. Caregivers provided feedback on repositioning with and without the CBPM system.
Results: Screenshots displayed lower pressures when the visual feedback from the CBPM systems was utilized by caregivers. Lower peak pressure measurements were also evident when caregivers utilized the image from the CBPM systems. Overall, caregivers felt the system enabled more effective patient positioning and increased the quality of care they provided their patients. Innovation: This is the first bedside pressure mapping device to be continuously used in a clinical setting to provide caregivers and patients visual, instant feedback of pressure, thereby enhancing repositioning and offloading practices.
Conclusion: With the visual feedback from the pressure mapping systems, caregivers were able to more effectively reposition patients, decreasing exposure to damaging high pressures.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24804157      PMCID: PMC4005484          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2013.0519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device.

Authors:  Peter Zimetbaum; Alena Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.

Authors:  Paul Kligfield; Leonard S Gettes; James J Bailey; Rory Childers; Barbara J Deal; E William Hancock; Gerard van Herpen; Jan A Kors; Peter Macfarlane; David M Mirvis; Olle Pahlm; Pentti Rautaharju; Galen S Wagner; Mark Josephson; Jay W Mason; Peter Okin; Borys Surawicz; Hein Wellens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping System for Prevention of Pressure Ulcer Development in the Medical ICU: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Aamir Siddiqui; Robert Behrendt; Marianne Lafluer; Susan Craft
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.546

4.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: results from the national Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System study.

Authors:  Courtney H Lyder; Yun Wang; Mark Metersky; Maureen Curry; Rebecca Kliman; Nancy R Verzier; David R Hunt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  How much time does it take to get a pressure ulcer? Integrated evidence from human, animal, and in vitro studies.

Authors:  Amit Gefen
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Patient repositioning and pressure ulcer risk--monitoring interface pressures of at-risk patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Peterson; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Wilhelm K Schwab; Johannes H van Oostrom; Lawrence J Caruso
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of a pressure-sensing mattress cover system for reducing interface pressure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Holly Wong; Jaime Kaufman; Barry Baylis; John M Conly; David B Hogan; Henry T Stelfox; Danielle A Southern; William A Ghali; Chester H Ho
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Smart medical beds in patient-care environments of the twenty-first century: a state-of-art survey.

Authors:  Ignacio Ghersi; Mario Mariño; Mónica Teresita Miralles
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Differences in the body pressure-related sensory changes between the floor and mattress in a static supine position for physiotherapy research: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Won-Deok Lee; Jeong-Uk Lee; Mee-Young Kim; Lim-Kyu Lee; Byoung-Sun Park; Seung-Min Yang; Ji-Woong Noh; Yong-Sub Shin; Ju-Hyun Kim; Taek-Yong Kwak; Tae-Hyun Lee; Jaehong Park; Junghwan Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28

4.  Effects of seating education and cushion management for adaptive sitting posture in spinal cord injury: Two case reports.

Authors:  Myoung-Ok Park; Sang-Heon Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.