| Literature DB >> 24804027 |
Marta Pokora1, Ewelina Eckert1, Aleksandra Zambrowicz1, Lukasz Bobak1, Marek Szołtysik1, Anna Dąbrowska1, Józefa Chrzanowska1, Antoni Polanowski1, Tadeusz Trziszka1.
Abstract
Enzymatic hydrolysis led to improve functional properties and biological activity of protein by-products, which can be further used as protein ingredients for food and feed applications. The effects of proteolytic enzyme modification of egg-yolk protein preparation (YP) and white protein preparation (WP), obtained as the by-products left during the course of lecithin, lysozyme, and cystatin isolation on their biological and functional properties, were evaluated by treating a commercial Neutrase. The antihypertensive and antioxidative properties of YP and WP hydrolysates were evaluated based on their angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory activity and radical scavenging (DPPH) capacity, ferric reducing power, and chelating of iron activity. The functionality of obtained hydrolysates was also determined. Neutrase caused a degree of hydrolysis (DH) of YP and WP by-products: 27.6% and 20.9%, respectively. In each of them, mixture of peptides with different molecular masses were also observed. YP hydrolysate showed high levels of antioxidant activity. The scavenging capacity, ferric reducing power, and chelating capacity were observed at the level: 0.44 μmol/L Trolox mg(-1), 177.35 μg Fe(2+) mg(-1), and 549.87 μg Fe(2+) mg(-1), respectively. YP hydrolysate also exhibited significant ACE-inhibitory activity, in which the level was 59.2 μg. Protein solubility was significantly improved as the DH increased. WP hydrolysate showed high water-holding capacity of 43.2. This study indicated that YP and WP hydrolysates could be used in foods as natural antioxidants and functionality enhancers.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; bioactive peptides; egg proteins; hydrolysis
Year: 2013 PMID: 24804027 PMCID: PMC3967756 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Amino acid composition of egg-white (WP) and egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates
| Composition (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid | WP hydrolysate | YP hydrolysate | Reference for human EAA |
| Hydrophobic amino acid | |||
| Gly | 5.83 | 5.56 | – |
| Ala | 8.93 | 8.18 | – |
| Val | 7.94 | 6.93 | 1.3 |
| Leu | 8.65 | 8.61 | 1.9 |
| Ile | 5.63 | 5.29 | 1.3 |
| Met | 3.54 | 2.29 | 1.7 |
| Pro | 4.25 | 4.86 | – |
| Hydrophobic, flavor amino acid | |||
| Phe | 5.21 | 3.91 | – |
| Tyr | 2.74 | 3.02 | – |
| Hydrophilic amino acid | |||
| Arg | 4.13 | 5.36 | – |
| His | 2.04 | 2.19 | 1.6 |
| Ser | 7.97 | 9.21 | – |
| Lys | 5.79 | 6.86 | 1.6 |
| Asx' | 10.08 | 10.18 | – |
| Glx' | 12.51 | 11.63 | – |
| Thr | 4.75 | 5.92 | 0.9 |
Asx', Asp + Asn; Glx', Glu + Gln.
Suggested profile of essential amino acid requirements for adult humans, FAO/WHO (1990).
Essential amino acids.
ACE-inhibitory activity of egg-white (WP) and egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates
| Sample | IC 50 (μg) |
|---|---|
| WP substrate | 0 |
| WP 2 h hydrolysis | 245.7a |
| YP substrate | 0 |
| YP 2 h hydrolysis | 59.2b |
a,bThe same letters indicate no statistical significant difference at P = 0.05.
Water-holding capacity of egg-white (WP) and egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates
| Water-holding capacity (%) | |
|---|---|
| WP substrate | 20.7 |
| WP 2 h hydrolysis | 43.2 |
| YP substrate | 6.7 |
| YP 2 h hydrolysis | 12.8 |
Figure 1The degree of hydrolysis (DH) of egg-yolk (YP) and egg-white (WP) protein preparations treated by Neutrase.
Figure 2Changes in free amino groups contents (FAG) in egg-yolk (YP) and egg-white (WP) protein preparation treated by Neutrase.
Figure 3Peptide profiles of (A) egg-white (WP) and (B) egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography [RP-HPLC]).
Figure 4Peptide molecular weight repartition for (A) egg-white (WP) and (B) egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates.
Figure 5DPPH (2,2-di(4-tert-octylphenyl)-1-picrylhydrazyl) scavenging activity of egg-yolk (YP) and egg-white (WP) protein preparation hydrolysates.
Figure 6The ferric reducing ability (FRAP) of egg-yolk (YP) and egg-white (WP) protein preparation hydrolysates.
Figure 7Ferrous ion-chelating activity of egg-yolk (YP) and egg-white (WP) protein preparation hydrolysates.
Figure 8Water solubility profiles of egg-white (WP) and egg-yolk (YP) protein hydrolysates.
Figure 9Emulsifying capacity of egg-white (WP) and egg-yolk (YP) protein preparation hydrolysates at pH 6.5.