Literature DB >> 24803078

Barriers to the uptake of biosimilars and possible solutions: a Belgian case study.

Pieter Dylst1, Arnold Vulto, Steven Simoens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are medicinal products that are similar to a biopharmaceutical that has already been authorised. As biopharmaceuticals are expected to dominate the best-selling pharmaceuticals worldwide by 2016, the emergence of biosimilars imposes an important challenge for governments. At this moment, the uptake of biosimilars in Belgium is limited, with market shares close to 0%.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the barriers that impede the uptake of biosimilars in Belgium.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate in depth the barriers to the uptake of biosimilars in Belgium. Respondents were selected through selective sampling so that all different stakeholders were represented (authorities, physicians, pharmacists, patients, academics and industry). Respondents were contacted by e-mail and letter with a request for participation. A thematic framework was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Three main barriers to the uptake of biosimilars in the Belgian market were identified: a lack of confidence towards biosimilars by some stakeholders; uncertainty about the interchangeability and substitution of biosimilars; and a hospital financing system that discourages the use of them. Providing all stakeholders with objective information on the concept of biosimilars, reforming the financing of hospitals, developing and implementing prescription quota in hospitals, setting up patient registries for biosimilars and speeding up the pricing and reimbursement process of biosimilars are suggested solutions to increase the uptake of biosimilars in Belgium.
CONCLUSIONS: To fully capture the potential savings of biosimilars, governments should take measures to increase their uptake. The Belgian government, and also the manufacturers of biosimilars, should take measures to reduce the uncertainties related to biosimilars and raise confidence among prescribers. In addition, the financing of hospitals should be reformed and incentives should be developed to stimulate physicians to prescribe biosimilars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24803078     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0163-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biosimilars and market access: a question of comparability and costs?

Authors:  Steven Simoens; Gilbert Verbeken; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Different pharmaceutical products need similar terminology.

Authors:  Daan J A Crommelin; Jon S B de Vlieger; Vera Weinstein; Stefan Mühlebach; Vinod P Shah; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Health economics of market access for biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Acceptable changes in quality attributes of glycosylated biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Martin Schiestl; Thomas Stangler; Claudia Torella; Tadej Cepeljnik; Hansjörg Toll; Roger Grau
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Biosimilars-why terminology matters.

Authors:  Martina Weise; Marie-Christine Bielsky; Karen De Smet; Falk Ehmann; Niklas Ekman; Gopalan Narayanan; Hans-Karl Heim; Esa Heinonen; Kowid Ho; Robin Thorpe; Camille Vleminckx; Meenu Wadhwa; Christian K Schneider
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  The safety of switching between therapeutic proteins.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Michael Muenzberg; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  Biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor uptakes in the EU-5 markets: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  François Bocquet; Pascal Paubel; Isabelle Fusier; Anne-Laure Cordonnier; Claude Le Pen; Martine Sinègre
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Biosimilar competition: lessons from Europe.

Authors:  Henry Grabowski; Rahul Guha; Maria Salgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 9.  A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study.

Authors:  Suzanne Dunne; Bill Shannon; Colum Dunne; Walter Cullen
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.483

  9 in total
  31 in total

Review 1.  Biosimilar: what it is not.

Authors:  Fernando de Mora
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Knowledge, behaviors and practices of community and hospital pharmacists towards biosimilar medicines: Results of a French web-based survey.

Authors:  Morgane Beck; Bruno Michel; Marie-Christine Rybarczyk-Vigouret; Dominique Levêque; Christelle Sordet; Jean Sibilia; Michel Velten
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Competition Between Biosimilars and Patented Biologics: Learning from European and Japanese Experience.

Authors:  François Bocquet; Anaïs Loubière; Isabelle Fusier; Anne-Laure Cordonnier; Pascal Paubel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Biosimilars in the USA: Will New Efforts to Spur Approvals and Access Spur Uptake and Cost Savings?

Authors:  Stanton R Mehr; Richard A Brook
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-02

5.  Pharmacists' Perspectives of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Noraisyah Mohd Sani; Zoriah Aziz; Rema Panickar; Adeeba Kamarulzaman
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 7.744

6.  Effect on Patients' Outcomes of a Change to Biosimilar Filgrastim Product in Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization.

Authors:  Jennifer Fenna; Micheal Guirguis; Caroline Ibrahim; Neeta Shirvaikar; Irwindeep Sandhu; Sunita Ghosh; Melissa Jenkins
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 7.  Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars.

Authors:  George Dranitsaris; Ira Jacobs; Carol Kirchhoff; Robert Popovian; Lesley G Shane
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-09-29

8.  Supply-side and demand-side policies for biosimilars: an overview in 10 European member states.

Authors:  Cécile Rémuzat; Anna Kapuśniak; Aleksandra Caban; Dan Ionescu; Guerric Radière; Cyril Mendoza; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-04-28

9.  Knowledge and perception of biosimilars in ambulatory care: a survey among Belgian community pharmacists and physicians.

Authors:  Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys; Liese Barbier; Yannick Vandenplas; Steven Simoens; Paul Declerck
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 10.  Developing the Totality of Evidence for Biosimilars: Regulatory Considerations and Building Confidence for the Healthcare Community.

Authors:  Richard Markus; Jennifer Liu; Monica Ramchandani; Diana Landa; Teresa Born; Primal Kaur
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.