Literature DB >> 24802978

Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.

Silvia Schiavolin1, Paolo Ferroli, Francesco Acerbi, Stefano Brock, Morgan Broggi, Alberto Cusin, Marco Schiariti, Sergio Visintini, Rui Quintas, Matilde Leonardi, Alberto Raggi.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess factor structure, internal consistency and validity of the Italian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 12-item version (WHODAS-12) in patients scheduled for neurosurgical procedures for brain tumours, cerebrovascular or spinal diseases. Disability was assessed with the WHODAS-12, quality of life with the eight-item European Health Interview Survey-Quality of Life, well-being with the Psychological General Well-Being Index-Short and general health with the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scales. Factor analysis was used to confirm WHODAS-12 one-factor structure; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and χ2/d.f. ratio were used to test the model fit. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α coefficient, item-total correlation and interitem correlation; convergent validity was assessed with Pearson's coefficient and discriminative validity was assessed with the t-test, dividing patients between those with KPS greater than 90 and KPS of 90 or less. The one-factor structure was confirmed (RMSEA=0.079; χ2/d.f.=2.16) and internal consistency was adequate. Correlations between the three outcome measures were significant, negative and moderate; the t-test showed disability scores to be statistically significantly higher in patients with KPS of 90 or less. Our results confirm factor structure and validity of WHODAS-12 in Italian neurosurgical inpatients; we therefore support its use in neurosurgery departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802978     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

1.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2 in preoperative patients.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ida; Yusuke Naito; Yuu Tanaka; Yasunori Matsunari; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples.

Authors:  Melissa A MacLeod; Paul F Tremblay; Kathryn Graham; Sharon Bernards; Jürgen Rehm; Samantha Wells
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Engaging patients and family members in the evaluation of a mental health patient portal: protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Gillian Strudwick; Craig Kuziemsky; Richard G Booth; Sarah Collins; Anna Chyjek; Moshe Sakal; Alexandra Harris; John Strauss
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0.

Authors:  Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska; Bernard Sozański; Hubert Kotarski; Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska; Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.