Literature DB >> 24802744

Modified transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for men with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before brachytherapy is safe and feasible.

Philip Brousil1, Muddassar Hussain, Mark Lynch, Robert W Laing, Stephen E M Langley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the urinary toxicity outcomes for patients at greater risk of voiding symptoms and retention who received a modified limited transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) before low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: Data were analysed from patients receiving the above procedures between 2006 to present, taken from the prospective brachytherapy database of 2000 patients at the St. Luke's Cancer Centre. The limited TURP (TURP(BXT) ) was performed at a median (range) of 64 (25-205) days before seed implantation with a median resection weight of 1.15 g. Selection criteria were based on patients with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms, poor flow or post-void residual urine volume (PVR), or a prominent middle lobe or high bladder neck on transrectal ultrasonography. Baseline prostate cancer characteristics, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality-of-life QoL scores were collected and compared with follow-up IPSS and QoL scores.
RESULTS: Data for 112 patients was gathered from the database. The TURP(BXT) resulted in statistically significant improvements before LDR brachytherapy in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and PVR, IPSS and QoL scores (the mean Qmax before vs after the TURP(BXT) was 11.3 vs 16.7 mL/s). The IPSS and QoL scores at 6 months after seed implantation were increased compared with baseline values before the TURP(BXT) (mean IPSS at 6 months 11.7 vs 9.2 before TURP(BXT) ), but no difference at 1 year (mean IPSS 9), and improved scores at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years follow-up (mean IPSS of 7.9, 5.6, 5.3 and 7.4, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests patients at increased risk of deteriorating voiding symptoms, including urinary retention, are no longer contraindicated against LDR brachytherapy if they receive a modified TURP before seed implantation. This procedure does not appear to carry the risk of urinary incontinence thought to be associated with a conventional TURP before LDR brachytherapy.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LUTS; TURP; brachytherapy; prostate; urinary toxicity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802744     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

Review 1.  A single institution analysis of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: 5-year reported survival and late toxicity outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Chao; Sandra Spencer; Mario Guerrieri; Wei Ding; Mehran Goharian; Huong Ho; Michael Ng; Danielle Healey; Alwin Tan; Chee Cham; Daryl Lim Joon; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Douglas Travis; Shomik Sengupta; Yee Chan; Andrew Troy; Trung Pham; David Clarke; Peter Liodakis; Damien Bolton
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 2.  Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Bradley J Stish; Brian J Davis; Lance A Mynderse; Robert H McLaren; Christopher L Deufel; Richard Choo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06

3.  Concurrent placement of SpaceOAR gel and gold fiducials during HoLEP: a case report.

Authors:  Meera B Ganesh; Briana S Kaplunov; Matthew S Lee; Mark A Assmus; Ashley E Ross; Joy Coleman; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-01-19

4.  Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml).

Authors:  Yumei Jiang; Xiaojing Bai; Xinwei Zhang; Meiyu Wang; Juanhua Tian; Lijun Mu; Na Zhang; Man Li; Yuefeng Du
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.