Literature DB >> 24802370

Three-dimensional cellular distribution in polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration: a microCT analysis compared to SEM, CLSM and DNA content.

A Parrilli1, S Pagani, M C Maltarello, S Santi, A Salerno, P A Netti, R Giardino, L Rimondini, M Fini.   

Abstract

In orthopaedic surgery the tissues damaged by injury or disease could be replaced using constructs based on biocompatible materials, cells and growth factors. Scaffold design, porosity and early colonization are key components for the implant success. From biological point of view, attention may be also given to the number, type and size of seeded cells, as well as the seeding technique and cell morphological and volumetric alterations. This paper describes the use of the microCT approach (to date used principally for mineralized matrix quantification) to observe construct colonization in terms of cell localization, and make a direct comparison of the microtomographic sections with scanning electron microscopy images and confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. Briefly, polycaprolactone scaffolds were seeded at different cell densities with MG63 osteoblastic-like cells. Two different endpoints, 1 and 2 weeks, were selected for the three-dimensional colonization and proliferation analysis of the cells. By observing all images obtained, in addition to a more extensive distribution of cells on scaffolds surfaces than in the deeper layers, cell volume increased at 2 weeks compared to 1 week after seeding. Combining the cell number quantification by deoxyribonucleic acid analysis and the single cell volume changes by confocal laser scanning microscope, we validated the microCT segmentation method by finding no statistical differences in the evaluation of the cell volume fraction of the scaffold. Furthermore, the morphological results of this study suggest that an effective scaffold colonization requires a precise balance between different factors, such as number, type and size of seeded cells in addition to scaffold porosity.
© 2014 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2014 Royal Microscopical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cell distribution; microCT; microtomography; scaffold; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802370     DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  3 in total

1.  Micro X-Ray Computed Tomography Mass Loss Assessment of Different UHMWPE: A Hip Joint Simulator Study on Standard vs. Cross-Linked Polyethylene.

Authors:  Saverio Affatato; Filippo Zanini; Simone Carmignato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Modeling, validation and verification of three-dimensional cell-scaffold contacts from terabyte-sized images.

Authors:  Peter Bajcsy; Soweon Yoon; Stephen J Florczyk; Nathan A Hotaling; Mylene Simon; Piotr M Szczypinski; Nicholas J Schaub; Carl G Simon; Mary Brady; Ram D Sriram
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Quality control methods in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: from imaging to biosensors.

Authors:  Daniele Zuncheddu; Elena Della Bella; Andrea Schwab; Dalila Petta; Gaia Rocchitta; Silvia Generelli; Felix Kurth; Annapaola Parrilli; Sophie Verrier; Julietta V Rau; Marco Fosca; Margherita Maioli; Pier Andrea Serra; Mauro Alini; Heinz Redl; Sibylle Grad; Valentina Basoli
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 13.567

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.