Literature DB >> 24802305

Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.

Takeshi Umemoto1, Ei Ueno2, Takeshi Matsumura3, Makoto Yamakawa4, Hiroko Bando5, Tsuyoshi Mitake3, Tsuyoshi Shiina6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal the background to the image variations in strain elastography (strain imaging [SI]) depending on the manner of manipulation (compression magnitude) during elasticity image (EI) acquisition. Thirty patients with 33 breast lesions who had undergone surgery followed by SI assessment in vivo were analyzed. An analytical approach to tissue elasticity based on the stress-elastic modulus (Young's modulus) relationship was adopted. Young's moduli were directly measured ex vivo in surgical specimens ranging from 2.60 kPa (fat) to 16.08 kPa (invasive carcinoma) under the weak-stress condition (<0.2-0.4 kPa, which corresponds to the appropriate "light touch" technique in SI investigation. The contrast (ratio) of lesion to fat in elasticity ex vivo gradually decreased as the stress applied increased (around 1.0 kPa) on the background of significant non-linearity of the breast tissue. Our results indicate that the differences in non-linearity in elasticity between the different tissues within the breast under minimal stress conditions are closely related to the variation in EI quality. The significance of the "pre-load compression" concept in tissue elasticity evaluation is recognized. Non-linearity of elasticity is an essential attribute of living subjects and could provide useful information having a considerable impact on clinical diagnosis in quantitative ultrasound elastography.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Elastic modulus (Young's modulus); Elasticity imaging; Elastography; Non-linearity; Pre-load compression; Shear wave imaging; Strain; Strain imaging; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802305     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the masseter muscle elasticity with the use of acoustic coupling agents as references in strain sonoelastography.

Authors:  M Nakayama; Y Ariji; W Nishiyama; E Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawada; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  3D modeling in cancer studies.

Authors:  Oula El Atat; Zahra Farzaneh; Mahsa Pourhamzeh; Fatima Taki; Ralph Abi-Habib; Massoud Vosough; Mirvat El-Sibai
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  A preliminary prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of assist strain ratio versus manual strain ratio.

Authors:  Ei Ueno; Eriko Tohno; Isamu Morishima; Takeshi Umemoto; Koji Waki
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Regenerative tissue filler for breast conserving surgery and other soft tissue restoration and reconstruction needs.

Authors:  Theodore J Puls; Carla S Fisher; Abigail Cox; Jeannie M Plantenga; Emma L McBride; Jennifer L Anderson; Craig J Goergen; Melissa Bible; Tracy Moller; Sherry L Voytik-Harbin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Tissue engineered platforms for studying primary and metastatic neoplasm behavior in bone.

Authors:  Victoria L Thai; Katherine H Griffin; Steven W Thorpe; R Lor Randall; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.