Literature DB >> 24801464

The Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) survey: patients' experience with allergen immunotherapy.

David P Skoner1, Michael S Blaiss, Mark S Dykewicz, Nancy Smith, Bryan Leatherman, Leonard Bielory, Nicole Walstein, Timothy J Craig, Felicia Allen-Ramey.   

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is used for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis as a subcutaneous injection (subcutaneous immunotherapy [SCIT]). Extracts used for SCIT are also used off-label to formulate a liquid delivered as sublingual drops (sublingual immunotherapy [SLIT]). This study was designed to survey patients' experiences and beliefs regarding SCIT and SLIT. People who had ever been diagnosed with nasal and/or ocular allergies were identified in a 2012 telephone survey of U.S. households. Respondents were asked questions about their or their child's use of SCIT and SLIT and their beliefs about AIT. Of 2765 respondents, 46.5% had ever heard of AIT and 22.7% had ever initiated it: 20.9% with SCIT and 1.8% with SLIT (p < 0.0001). The most frequently cited reason for beginning AIT was that symptoms were unresolved with other medications (SCIT, 32.1%; SLIT, 14.0%). Some or full symptom relief was reported by 74.9% of respondents treated with SCIT and 66.0% of those treated with SLIT (p = 0.17 for SCIT versus SLIT). Approximately one-third of respondents who had ever heard of or had been treated with AIT said "don't know" when asked if immunotherapy controls allergy symptoms for years (33.6%), is a very safe treatment (29.3%), or can cure allergy symptoms (27.5%). Effective relief of allergy symptoms was cited most often as the primary benefit of SCIT (37.8%) and convenience was the primary benefit of SLIT (14%). Only one-fifth of respondents had ever been treated with AIT, largely with SCIT. More than one-half of respondents had never heard of AIT and respondents' beliefs indicated a need for educational efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24801464     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  5 in total

Review 1.  ARIA 2019, Allerjik Rinite Tedavi Yaklaşımı-Türkiye.

Authors:  Ayşe Arzu Yorgancıoğlu; Bilun Gemicioğlu; Cemal Cingi; Ömer Kalaycı; Ali Fuat Kalyoncu; Claus Bachert; Peter Hellings; Oliver Pfaar; Holger J Schünemann; Dana Wallace; Anna Bedbrook; Wienczyslawa Czarlewski; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2020-03-01

Review 2.  The Future of Sublingual Immunotherapy in the United States.

Authors:  Nicole Pleskovic; Ashton Bartholow; Deborah A Gentile; David P Skoner
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Quality of life issues ranging from the burden of ocular and nasal allergies to the anxiety associated with having to carry self-injectable epinephrine for insect sting allergy.

Authors:  Joseph A Bellanti; Russell A Settipane
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.587

4.  The effect of a new communication template on anticipated willingness to initiate or resume allergen immunotherapy: an internet-based patient survey.

Authors:  Moises A Calderon; Linda Cox; Thomas B Casale; Ralph Mösges; Oliver Pfaar; Hans-Jørgen Malling; Joaquin Sastre; Musa Khaitov; Pascal Demoly
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.406

5.  Physician's recommendation and explanation is important in the initiation and maintenance of allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Young-Hee Nam; Soo-Keol Lee
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.