Literature DB >> 24801264

Assisted techniques for vertebral cementoplasty: why should we do it?

M Muto1, S Marcia2, G Guarnieri3, V Pereira4.   

Abstract

Assisted techniques (AT) for vertebral cementoplasty include multiple mini-invasive percutaneous systems in which vertebral augmentation is obtained through mechanical devices with the aim to reach the best vertebral height restoration. As an evolution of the vertebroplasty, the rationale of the AT-treatment is to combine the analgesic and stability effect of cement injection with the restoration of a physiological height for the collapsed vertebral body. Reduction of the vertebral body kyphotic deformity, considering the target of normal spine biomechanics, could improve all systemic potential complications evident in patient with vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Main indications for AT are related to fractures in fragile vertebral osseous matrix and non-osteoporotic vertebral lesions due to spine metastasis or trauma. Many companies developed different systems for AT having the same target but different working cannula, different vertebral height restoration system and costs. Aim of this review is to discuss about vertebral cementoplasty procedures and techniques, considering patient inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as all related minor and/or major interventional complications.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted technique cementoplasty; Cerament; Kyphoplasty; Spine jack; Vertebral body stenting; Vertebral compression fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24801264     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous stabilization of lumbar spine: a literature review and new options in treating spine pain.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Luca Saba; Mariangela Marras; Jasjit S Suri; Eros Calabria; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  [Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for spinal trauma].

Authors:  F Ahlhelm; R Omidi
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Authors:  Mario Muto; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Francesco Giurazza; Luigi Manfrè
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  [Cement augmentation on the spine : Biomechanical considerations].

Authors:  J P Kolb; L Weiser; R A Kueny; G Huber; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES.

Authors:  Diogo Filipe Lino Moura; Josué Pereira Gabriel
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 0.683

Review 6.  The role of emergency radiology in spinal trauma.

Authors:  Gianluigi Guarnieri; Roberto Izzo; Mario Muto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A novel vertebroplasty technique using a larger-diameter needle for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Eugene J Park; Ho-Jin Lee; Min-Gu Jang; Jae-Sung Ahn; Sang Bum Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Chang; Xinyan Zhang; Ning Jiao; Peizhi Yuwen; Yanbin Zhu; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Efficacy of a Novel Vertebral Body Augmentation System in the Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Vertebral Body Fractures.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Emanuele Piras; Joshua A Hirsch; Alessio Mereu; Mariangela Marras; Alessio Spinelli; Luca Saba
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.740

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.