Literature DB >> 24800758

Integrating relationship- and research-based approaches in Australian health promotion practice.

Christiane Klinner1, Stacy M Carter1, Lucie Rychetnik2, Vincy Li1, Michelle Daley3, Avigdor Zask4, Beverly Lloyd5.   

Abstract

We examine the perspectives of health promotion practitioners on their approaches to determining health promotion practice, in particular on the role of research and relationships in this process. Using Grounded Theory methods, we analysed 58 semi-structured interviews with 54 health promotion practitioners in New South Wales, Australia. Practitioners differentiated between relationship-based and research-based approaches as two sources of knowledge to guide health promotion practice. We identify several tensions in seeking to combine these approaches in practice and describe the strategies that participants adopted to manage these tensions. The strategies included working in an evidence-informed rather than evidence-based way, creating new evidence about relationship-based processes and outcomes, adopting 'relationship-based' research and evaluation methods, making research and evaluation useful for communities, building research and evaluation skills and improving collaboration between research and evaluation and programme implementation staff. We conclude by highlighting three systemic factors which could further support the integration of research-based and relationship-based health promotion practices: (i) expanding conceptions of health promotion evidence, (ii) developing 'relationship-based' research methods that enable practitioners to measure complex social processes and outcomes and to facilitate community participation and benefit, and (iii) developing organizational capacity.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community participation; health promotion practice; qualitative research; research and evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24800758     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  2 in total

1.  Supporting health promotion practitioners to undertake evaluation for program development.

Authors:  Roanna Lobo; Mark Petrich; Sharyn K Burns
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  "Layers of translation" - evidence literacy in public health practice: a qualitative secondary analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Martin; Joan Wharf Higgins; Bernadette Bernie Pauly; Marjorie MacDonald
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.