Literature DB >> 24800752

Evaluation and automatic correction of metal-implant-induced artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging.

G Schramm1, J Maus, F Hofheinz, J Petr, A Lougovski, B Beuthien-Baumann, I Platzek, J van den Hoff.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe a new automatic method for compensation of metal-implant-induced segmentation errors in MR-based attenuation maps (MRMaps) and to evaluate the quantitative influence of those artifacts on the reconstructed PET activity concentration. The developed method uses a PET-based delineation of the patient contour to compensate metal-implant-caused signal voids in the MR scan that is segmented for PET attenuation correction. PET emission data of 13 patients with metal implants examined in a Philips Ingenuity PET/MR were reconstructed with the vendor-provided method for attenuation correction (MRMap(orig), PET(orig)) and additionally with a method for attenuation correction (MRMap(cor), PET(cor)) developed by our group. MRMaps produced by both methods were visually inspected for segmentation errors. The segmentation errors in MRMap(orig) were classified into four classes (L1 and L2 artifacts inside the lung and B1 and B2 artifacts inside the remaining body depending on the assigned attenuation coefficients). The average relative SUV differences (ε(rel)(av)) between PET(orig) and PET(cor) of all regions showing wrong attenuation coefficients in MRMap(orig) were calculated. Additionally, relative SUV(mean) differences (ε(rel)) of tracer accumulations in hot focal structures inside or in the vicinity of these regions were evaluated. MRMap(orig) showed erroneous attenuation coefficients inside the regions affected by metal artifacts and inside the patients' lung in all 13 cases. In MRMap(cor), all regions with metal artifacts, except for the sternum, were filled with the soft-tissue attenuation coefficient and the lung was correctly segmented in all patients. MRMap(cor) only showed small residual segmentation errors in eight patients. ε(rel)(av) (mean ± standard deviation) were: (-56 ± 3)% for B1, (-43 ± 4)% for B2, (21 ± 18)% for L1, (120 ± 47)% for L2 regions. ε(rel) (mean ± standard deviation) of hot focal structures were: (-52 ± 12)% in B1, (-45 ± 13)% in B2, (19 ± 19)% in L1, (51 ± 31)% in L2 regions. Consequently, metal-implant-induced artifacts severely disturb MR-based attenuation correction and SUV quantification in PET/MR. The developed algorithm is able to compensate for these artifacts and improves SUV quantification accuracy distinctly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24800752     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/11/2713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of TOF versus non-TOF on PET artifacts in simultaneous PET/MR: a dual centre experience.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangtae Ahn; Florian Wiesinger; M Mehdi Khalighi; Craig S Levin; Andrei H Iagaru; Greg Zaharchuk; Martin Huellner; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Quantitative accuracy of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jorge Daniel Oldan; Amir Hossein Khandani; Julia R Fielding; Ellen Louise Jones; Paola Alvarez Gehrig; Tiffany Matoska Sills; Pinakpani Roy; Weili Lin
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

3.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Head and Neck MRI RF Array Integrated with a 511 keV Transmission Source for Attenuation Correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Lucia Isabel Navarro de Lara; Roberta Frass-Kriegl; Andreas Renner; Jürgen Sieg; Michael Pichler; Thomas Bogner; Ewald Moser; Thomas Beyer; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Michael Figl; Elmar Laistler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Dental artifacts in the head and neck region: implications for Dixon-based attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Claes N Ladefoged; Adam E Hansen; Sune H Keller; Barbara M Fischer; Jacob H Rasmussen; Ian Law; Andreas Kjær; Liselotte Højgaard; Francois Lauze; Thomas Beyer; Flemming L Andersen
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2015-03-11

Review 5.  Metal artifact correction strategies in MRI-based attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Claes Nøhr Ladefoged
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-11-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.