Literature DB >> 24800651

Recombinant factor IX: discrepancies between one-stage clotting and chromogenic assays.

H V Wilmot1, J Hogwood, E Gray.   

Abstract

New and modified recombinant factor IX (rFIX) products are in development and accurate potency estimation is important to ensure the consistency of production and efficacy of these therapeutics. Collaborative study data obtained during the replacement of the 3rd International Standard (IS) for FIX concentrate suggested that there was a discrepancy between potency estimates for rFIX using clotting and chromogenic methods, when the rFIX candidate was measured against the plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX) IS. This study explores potential chromogenic and one-stage clotting method discrepancies in more detail. Five batches each of rFIX and pdFIX were assayed against the 4th IS FIX concentrate (a pdFIX) by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) one-stage clotting assay and specific functional chromogenic assay. The potency of rFIX by chromogenic assay was consistently around 70% of the one-stage clotting potency (average 78 and 108 IU mL(-1) respectively). These differences were not observed with pdFIX, which had similar potencies (average 96 IU mL(-1) ) by each assay method. In addition, different APTT reagents yielded different potency estimates for rFIX when assayed against the pdFIX IS, with a variation of up to 23%. In all cases, the differences were largely resolved when a rFIX reference was used as the standard. This study highlights some of the challenges associated with assay of rFIX products in the laboratory and that careful consideration needs to be given to the choice of reference material used. This is especially important with the imminent arrival of new and modified rFIX products.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromogenic assay; factor concentrates; one-stage clotting assay; plasma-derived factor IX; recombinant factor IX; standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24800651     DOI: 10.1111/hae.12449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Richard A Marlar; Karin Strandberg; Midori Shima; Dorothy M Adcock
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Performance of factor IX extended half-life product measurements in external quality control assessment programs.

Authors:  Angelique Nederlof; Steve Kitchen; Piet Meijer; Marjon Cnossen; Nae Ali Pour; Geoffrey Kershaw; Ian Jennings; Isobel Walker; Moniek P M de Maat
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 3.  International consensus recommendations on the management of people with haemophilia B.

Authors:  Daniel P Hart; Davide Matino; Jan Astermark; Gerard Dolan; Roseline d'Oiron; Cédric Hermans; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Adriana Linares; Tadashi Matsushita; Simon McRae; Margareth C Ozelo; Sean Platton; Darrel Stafford; Robert F Sidonio; Andreas Tiede
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Educational needs of hematologists and laboratory professionals regarding factor activity assays.

Authors:  Dorothy M Adcock; Mazi Rasulnia; Natalia Holot; David L Cooper
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2018-04-13

5.  Real-world assay variability between laboratories in monitoring of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein activity in plasma samples.

Authors:  Jurg M Sommer; Ali Sadeghi-Khomami; Christopher Barnowski; Margareta Wikén; Annemieke J Willemze
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Protein-Engineered Coagulation Factors for Hemophilia Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Samelson-Jones; Valder R Arruda
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 6.698

7.  Recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein activity assessment with the one-stage clotting assay: A multicenter, assessor-blinded, prospective study in Japan (J-Field Study).

Authors:  Katsuyuki Fukutake; Tomomi Kobayashi; Jurg M Sommer; Toshiyuki Hirakata
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Activity measurements of dalcinonacog alfa.

Authors:  Stella C Williams; Elaine Gray
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 9.  An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Jens Müller; Wolfgang Miesbach; Florian Prüller; Thomas Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Ulrich J Sachs
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 10.  Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations.

Authors:  Alfonso Iorio; Andrea N Edginton; Victor Blanchette; Jan Blatny; Ana Boban; Marjon Cnossen; Peter Collins; Stacy E Croteau; Katheljin Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Shinya Ito; Joan Korth-Bradley; Stefan Lethagen; David Lillicrap; Mike Makris; Ron Mathôt; Massimo Morfini; Ellis J Neufeld; Jeffrey Spears
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.