Literature DB >> 24800411

Auditory coding of human movement kinematics.

Pia M Vinken, Daniela Kröger, Ursula Fehse, Gerd Schmitz, Heike Brock, Alfred O Effenberg.   

Abstract

Although visual perception is dominant on motor perception, control and learning, auditory information can enhance and modulate perceptual as well as motor processes in a multifaceted manner. During last decades new methods of auditory augmentation had been developed with movement sonification as one of the most recent approaches expanding auditory movement information also to usually mute phases of movement. Despite general evidence on the effectiveness of movement sonification in different fields of applied research there is nearly no empirical proof on how sonification of gross motor human movement should be configured to achieve information rich sound sequences. Such lack of empirical proof is given for (a) the selection of suitable movement features as well as for (b) effective kinetic-acoustical mapping patterns and for (c) the number of regarded dimensions of sonification. In this study we explore the informational content of artificial acoustical kinematics in terms of a kinematic movement sonification using an intermodal discrimination paradigm. In a repeated measure design we analysed discrimination rates of six everyday upper limb actions to evaluate the effectiveness of seven different kinds of kinematic-acoustical mappings as well as short-term learning effects. The kinematics of the upper limb actions were calculated based on inertial motion sensor data and transformed into seven different sonifications. Sound sequences were randomly presented to participants and discrimination rates as well as confidence of choice were analysed. Data indicate an instantaneous comprehensibility of the artificial movement acoustics as well as short-term learning effects. No differences between different dimensional encodings became evident thus indicating a high efficiency for intermodal pattern discrimination for the acoustically coded velocity distribution of the actions. Taken together movement information related to continuous kinematic parameters can be transformed into the auditory domain. Additionally, pattern based action discrimination is obviously not restricted to the visual modality. Artificial acoustical kinematics might be used to supplement and/or substitute visual motion perception in sports and motor rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24800411     DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  11 in total

1.  Audio cues enhance mirroring of arm motion when visual cues are scarce.

Authors:  Edward D Lee; Edward Esposito; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Julia Reh; Gerd Schmitz; Tong-Hun Hwang; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Modulation of ellipses drawing by sonification.

Authors:  Eric O Boyer; Frederic Bevilacqua; Emmanuel Guigon; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnes Roby-Brami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Sense of Agency Is More Sensitive to Manipulations of Outcome than Movement-Related Feedback Irrespective of Sensory Modality.

Authors:  Nicole David; Stefan Skoruppa; Alessandro Gulberti; Johannes Schultz; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mapping Sonification for Perception and Action in Motor Skill Learning.

Authors:  John F Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Transposing musical skill: sonification of movement as concurrent augmented feedback enhances learning in a bimanual task.

Authors:  John Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-27

7.  Movement Sonification in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz; Jeannine Bergmann; Alfred O Effenberg; Carmen Krewer; Tong-Hun Hwang; Friedemann Müller
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Advantages of melodic over rhythmic movement sonification in bimanual motor skill learning.

Authors:  J F Dyer; P Stapleton; M W M Rodger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of Real-Time (Sonification) and Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli on Recovering Arm Function Post Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shashank Ghai
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Shaking Takete and Flowing Maluma. Non-Sense Words Are Associated with Motion Patterns.

Authors:  Markus Koppensteiner; Pia Stephan; Johannes Paul Michael Jäschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.