Literature DB >> 24799274

Development of a modelled anatomical replica for training young neurosurgeons.

Claudia Craven1, David Baxter, Martyn Cooke, Lydia Carline, Samuel J M M Alberti, Jonathan Beard, Mary Murphy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Modelled Anatomical Replica for Training Young Neurosurgeons (MARTYN) is a novel simulation model developed by the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng). This study describes the development of the model and aims to determine its feasibility as a potential future training tool. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Traditional model-making methods were used to develop a prototype. Initial procedural trials tested the feasibility of the model. Eighteen participants, grouped by experience (nine novices, four intermediates and five experienced), completed two tasks: a craniotomy and a burr hole followed by insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD). Subjective data on confidence, usefulness, realism and preference to other training modalities were collected via a standardised questionnaire and a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Preliminary trials of the model prototype demonstrated feasibility. The novice group had the greatest self-reported benefit from MARTYN training, with significant increases in self-rated confidence in both the craniotomy (p < 0.01) and EVD insertion (p < 0.05) procedures. MARTYN was reported to having good visual and tactile realism overall with the bone component being considered highly realistic. The model was reported to be a useful training tool. When asked to rank preferred training modalities, operative experience was chosen first with cadaveric training and MARTYN consistently scoring a second choice.
CONCLUSIONS: MARTYN was developed with the intention to fill the current niche for an inexpensive synthetic model head. This study shows that the use of MARTYN for training is both feasible and realistic. We demonstrate a preliminary face and construct validity of the model in this pilot study. With the reduction in working hours, we believe this model will be a suitable supplement to the current ST 1-3 level cadaveric training and will have a positive impact on patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model; neurosurgery; simulation; training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799274     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2014.913775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  5 in total

1.  Development and initial evaluation of a novel simulation model for comprehensive brain tumor surgery training.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Grosch; Timo Schröder; Torsten Schröder; Julia Onken; Thomas Picht
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance.

Authors:  Joseph Davids; Susruta Manivannan; Ara Darzi; Stamatia Giannarou; Hutan Ashrafian; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Evaluation of simulation models in neurosurgical training according to face, content, and construct validity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shreya Chawla; Sharmila Devi; Paola Calvachi; William B Gormley; Roberto Rueda-Esteban
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning.

Authors:  Eleanor C Mackle; Jonathan Shapey; Efthymios Maneas; Shakeel R Saeed; Robert Bradford; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Neurosurgical simulator for training aneurysm microsurgery-a user suitability study involving neurosurgeons and residents.

Authors:  Fredrick Johnson Joseph; Stefan Weber; Andreas Raabe; David Bervini
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.