PURPOSE: To describe the use, tolerability, and efficacy of episcleral silicone matrix cyclosporine (ESMC) implants in dogs with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). METHODS: Retrospective study. ESMC implants (1.9 cm length, 30% wt/wt CsA in silicone; with approximately 12 mg of CsA loaded into them) were used in dogs with KCS responsive to topical CsA (good candidate, GC) or not responsive (poor candidate, PC). Ocular surface inflammation scores, Schirmer tear test (STT) values, and ocular discharge quantity were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eyes (15 dogs) received an ESMC implant for KCS; 15 eyes were considered GC, and 12 were considered PC. Both GC eyes and PC eyes showed a significant increase in STT values (increase of 7.7 and 8.5 mm/min; P = 0.023 and P = 0.003, respectively) after placement of ESMC implants (mean follow-up 18 ± 2 and 10.4 ± 15 months, respectively). Clinical signs improved significantly in both groups during the same follow-up, with reduction in conjunctival hyperemia (P < 0.001), corneal neovascularization (P = 0.004), corneal opacity (P = 0.003), and ocular discharge (P = 0.002). ESMC implants were well tolerated by all dogs, but two eyes lost the device at 12-months and 1-week follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that the EMSC implants were well tolerated and efficacious in dogs with KCS responsive to topical CsA as well as dogs with poor response to topical therapy. Further study is needed to determine the duration of efficacy and optimal dose of CsA.
PURPOSE: To describe the use, tolerability, and efficacy of episcleral silicone matrix cyclosporine (ESMC) implants in dogs with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). METHODS: Retrospective study. ESMC implants (1.9 cm length, 30% wt/wt CsA in silicone; with approximately 12 mg of CsA loaded into them) were used in dogs with KCS responsive to topical CsA (good candidate, GC) or not responsive (poor candidate, PC). Ocular surface inflammation scores, Schirmer tear test (STT) values, and ocular discharge quantity were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eyes (15 dogs) received an ESMC implant for KCS; 15 eyes were considered GC, and 12 were considered PC. Both GC eyes and PC eyes showed a significant increase in STT values (increase of 7.7 and 8.5 mm/min; P = 0.023 and P = 0.003, respectively) after placement of ESMC implants (mean follow-up 18 ± 2 and 10.4 ± 15 months, respectively). Clinical signs improved significantly in both groups during the same follow-up, with reduction in conjunctival hyperemia (P < 0.001), corneal neovascularization (P = 0.004), corneal opacity (P = 0.003), and ocular discharge (P = 0.002). ESMC implants were well tolerated by all dogs, but two eyes lost the device at 12-months and 1-week follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that the EMSC implants were well tolerated and efficacious in dogs with KCS responsive to topical CsA as well as dogs with poor response to topical therapy. Further study is needed to determine the duration of efficacy and optimal dose of CsA.
Authors: Maura K W Bittencourt; Michele A Barros; João Flávio P Martins; Jose Paulo C Vasconcellos; Bruna P Morais; Celine Pompeia; Matheus Domingues Bittencourt; Karine Dos Santos Evangelho; Irina Kerkis; Cristiane V Wenceslau Journal: Cell Med Date: 2016-10-18
Authors: Antonio J Villatoro; Viviana Fernández; Silvia Claros; Gustavo A Rico-Llanos; José Becerra; José A Andrades Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: András M Komáromy; Dineli Bras; Douglas W Esson; Ronald L Fellman; Sinisa D Grozdanic; Larry Kagemann; Paul E Miller; Sayoko E Moroi; Caryn E Plummer; John S Sapienza; Eric S Storey; Leandro B Teixeira; Carol B Toris; Terah R Webb Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Eran Lavy; David Kirmayer; Zakhar Nudelman; Liya Orenshtein-Vilensky; Timothy G Rowan; Julia Shenderovich-Gefter; Michael Friedman Journal: Vet Anim Sci Date: 2022-02-02
Authors: Simona Destefanis; Daniela Giretto; Maria Cristina Muscolo; Alessandro Di Cerbo; Gianandrea Guidetti; Sergio Canello; Angela Giovazzino; Sara Centenaro; Giuseppe Terrazzano Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 2.741