Literature DB >> 24798497

Endonasal endoscopic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal cavities and skull base: Oncologic outcomes based on treatment strategy and tumor etiology.

John R de Almeida1, Shirley Y Su2, Maria Koutourousiou3, Francisco Vaz Guimaraes Filho3, Juan C Fernandez Miranda3, Eric W Wang4, Paul A Gardner3, Carl H Snyderman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncologic outcomes for sinonasal and skull base squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) needs investigation.
METHODS: Patients with SCC treated with EEA were stratified by treatment strategy and tumor etiology and reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated with EEA, or which 27 had definitive resection and 7 had debulking surgery. In the definitive group, 17 had de novo tumors and 10 had tumors arising from inverted papilloma. Definitive resection was associated with better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than debulking (62% vs 17%; p = .02; and 78% vs 30%; p = .03). Patients with de novo tumors had similar 5-year DFS and OS to those arising from inverted papilloma (62% vs 62%; p = .75; and 75% vs 86%; p = .24).
CONCLUSION: Definitive resection of sinonasal SCC with EEA provides sound oncologic outcomes. SCC arising from inverted papilloma does not have prognostic significance.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  debulking; endoscopic; inverted papilloma; oncologic; sinonasal; squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798497     DOI: 10.1002/hed.23731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base.

Authors:  Colin G Leonard; Vikram Padhye; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Costs and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Open versus Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Involvement.

Authors:  Terence S Fu; Eric Monteiro; Ian Witterick; Allan Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-06-30

3.  Comparative outcome of surgical and nonsurgical therapy for T4bN0M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Ruichen Li; Shu Tian; Lan Lin; Quan Liu; Shengzi Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Rahul K Sharma; Alexandria L Irace; Jonathan B Overdevest; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Technical Note: First Use of Endonasal Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy - Feasibility and Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Nina Wenda; Ralf Kiesslich; Jan Gosepath
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Complications in Salvage Surgery for Nasal and Paranasal Malignant Tumors Involving the Skull Base.

Authors:  Masanori Teshima; Hirotaka Shinomiya; Naoki Otsuki; Hidehito Kimura; Masaaki Taniguchi; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Eiji Kohmura; Ken-Ichi Nibu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-09-14

7.  Factors associated with a primary surgical approach for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Krupa Patel; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Luc T Morris; Ian Ganly; Benjamin R Roman; Sean M McBride; Viviane S Tabar; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Oncologic outcome of multimodality treatment for sinonasal malignancies: An 18-year experience.

Authors:  Meng-Yu Chen; Xin Wen; Yi Wei; Lin Chen; Zi-Xuan Huang; Tong Lu; Nian-Zhen Zheng; Jian Li; Wei-Ping Wen; Yi-Hui Wen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.